Literature DB >> 9848587

Specificity of the Speed's test: arthroscopic technique for evaluating the biceps tendon at the level of the bicipital groove.

W F Bennett1.   

Abstract

A positive Speed's test result is usually thought to suggest inflammation or lesions related to the biceps/labral complex. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values are determined for the Speed's test. A prospective study design was developed for all patients with shoulder pain who presented between October 1, 1994 and February 28, 1995. The clinical results of the Speed's test were correlated with biceps/labral pathology by direct arthroscopic visualization. A neuroprobe is used to pull the biceps tendon into the articular portion of the glenohumeral joint so as to visualize the biceps tendon at the level of the bicipital groove. Forty-six shoulders in 45 patients, 31 men (average age, 53 years; range, 16 to 76 years) and 14 women (average age, 64 years; range, 30 to 80 years) with 26 dominant and 20 nondominant extremities were operated on during this time interval. The clinical evaluation showed that the speed's test was positive in 40 shoulders. Biceps/labral complex pathology was present in 10 of these patients. A specificity of 13.8%, a sensitivity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 83% were calculated. Thus, it is concluded that the Speed's test is a nonspecific but sensitive test for macroscopic biceps/labral pathology. This clinical examination is positive with a various number of other pathological shoulder problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848587     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  35 in total

Review 1.  [Proximal and distal rupture of the m. biceps brachii].

Authors:  O Lorbach; M Kieb; C Grim; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Current procedures for clinical evaluation of the shoulder].

Authors:  M Scheibel; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  A proposed evidence-based shoulder special testing examination algorithm: clinical utility based on a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicklaus E Biederwolf
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

5.  Current concepts in shoulder examination of the overhead athlete.

Authors:  Robert Manske; Todd Ellenbecker
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

6.  Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Elise Loock; Aude Michelet; Amaury D'Utruy; Pierre Molinazzi; Gerjon Hannink; Simon Bertiaux; Olivier Courage
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Detour sign in the diagnosis of subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon with arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Eun K Khil; Jang G Cha; Ji S Yi; Hyun-Joo Kim; Kyung D Min; Young C Yoon; Chan H Jeon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Shoulder arthroscopy remains superior to direct MR arthrography for diagnosis of subtle rotator interval lesions.

Authors:  Ashraf Anbar; Yasser Emad; Fatma Zeinhom; Yasser Ragab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-02

9.  Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; David E DeMik; Bastian Uribe; Brian R Wolf; Matthew Bollier
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

10.  Frequency of use of clinical shoulder examination tests by experienced shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Aaron D Sciascia; Tracy Spigelman; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.