Literature DB >> 9848426

Communication between physicians and with patients suffering from breast cancer.

W J van der Kam1, P J Branger, J H van Bemmel, B Meyboom-de Jong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The communication between GP and specialists is vital for the patient suffering from breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) the speed and type of communication between GPs, specialists and patients with breast cancer, and (ii) the problems that GPs encounter in the communication with specialists concerning these patients.
METHOD: In April 1995, 246 Dutch GPs from the Zwolle region (600 000 inhabitants) were invited to complete a questionnaire, using the information from the medical record and focusing on the last patient consulted with a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer.
RESULTS: Valid replies were received from 150 (61 %) GPs. The median period between initial referral date and receipt of the definite diagnosis from the surgeon was 4 weeks. After the patient's first appointment with the surgeon, the GPs received reports for 24% of the patients within 3 days; for 31% within 3-7 days; and for 16% of the patients after more than 2 weeks. After the first consultation between patient and surgeon, 68 (45%) of the 150 GPs reported that the patient contacted them; at this stage only 30 (20%) of these GPs had received a report from the surgeon. Thirty-one (21%) GPs did not contact the patient after receival of the definite diagnosis. GPs stated that the communication on patients with breast cancer is too slow (49%), or not frequent enough (25%); 25% of GPs found that the distribution of tasks between them and the specialists are not well described.
CONCLUSION: In the diagnostic stage of breast cancer the communication between GPs, specialists and patients varies widely, is too slow and is incomplete. An effect of this unsatisfactory communication is that the patient herself is the messenger of the bad news.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848426     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.5.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  Electronic messaging between primary and secondary care: a four-year case report.

Authors:  P W Moorman; P J Branger; W J van der Kam; J van der Lei
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Walsh; James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon; Lindy Masya
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  [Pain experience and pain therapy of tumor patients in the view of general practitioners].

Authors:  H Janig; W Pipam; S Lastin; R Sittl; G Bernatzky; R Likar
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  The '2-week rule' for suspected breast carcinoma: a qualitative study of the views of patients and professionals.

Authors:  Charles S Cornford; Jan Harley; Nigel Oswald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public.

Authors:  Marianne Piano; Georgia Black; Dorothee Amelung; Emily Power; Katriina L Whitaker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.