Literature DB >> 9848045

A matched-pair, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Acticoat silver-coated dressing for the treatment of burn wounds.

E E Tredget1, H A Shankowsky, A Groeneveld, R Burrell.   

Abstract

A new silver-coating technology was developed to prevent wound adhesion, limit nosocomial infection, control bacterial growth, and facilitate burn wound care through a silver-coated dressing material. For the purposes of this article, Acticoat (Westaim Biomedical Inc, Fort Saskatchawan, Alberta, Canada) silver-coated dressing was used. After in vitro and in vivo studies, a randomized, prospective clinical study was performed to assess the efficacy and ease of use of Acticoat dressing as compared with the efficacy and ease of our institution's standard burn wound care. Thirty burn patients with symmetric wounds were randomized to be treated with either 0.5% silver nitrate solution or Acticoat silver-coated dressing. The dressing was evaluated on the basis of overall patient comfort, ease of use for the wound care provider, and level of antimicrobial effectiveness. Wound pain was rated by the patient using a visual analog scale during dressing removal, application, and 2 hours after application. Ease of use was rated by the nurse providing wound care. Antimicrobial effectiveness was evaluated by quantitative burn wound biopsies performed before and at the end of treatment. Patients found dressing removal less painful with Acticoat than with silver nitrate, but they found the pain to be comparable during application and 2 hours after application. According to the nurses, there was no statistically significant difference in the ease of use. The frequency of burn wound sepsis (> 10(5) organisms per gram of tissue) was less in Acticoat-treated wounds than in those treated with silver nitrate (5 vs 16). Secondary bacteremias arising from infected burn wounds were also less frequent with Acticoat than with silver nitrate-treated wounds (1 vs 5). Acticoat dressing offers a new form of dressing for the burn wound, but it requires further investigation with greater numbers of patients in a larger number of centers and in different phases of burn wound care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848045     DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199811000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  26 in total

1.  Efficacy of hydrosurgical debridement and nanocrystalline silver dressings for infection prevention in type II and III open injuries.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Keen; Pratik P Desai; Christopher S Smith; Michael Suk
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Silver dressings: their role in wound management.

Authors:  David J Leaper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Cytotoxicity of silver dressings on diabetic fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shi-Bo Zou; Won-Young Yoon; Seung-Kyu Han; Seong-Ho Jeong; Zheng-Jun Cui; Woo-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Topical silver-impregnated dressings and the importance of the dressing technology.

Authors:  Keith Cutting; Richard White; Hans Hoekstra
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Antiseptics for burns.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Janice Christie; Zhenmi Liu; Maggie J Westby; Jayne M Jefferies; Thomas Hudson; Jacky Edwards; Devi Prasad Mohapatra; Ibrahim A Hassan; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-12

6.  The Role of Topical Antiseptic Agents Within Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies for Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site and Chronic Open Wound Infection.

Authors:  Christopher D Roberts; David J Leaper; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Evaluating antimicrobial efficacy of new commercially available silver dressings.

Authors:  Marion H Cavanagh; Robert E Burrell; Patricia L Nadworny
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns.

Authors:  Jason Wasiak; Heather Cleland; Fiona Campbell; Anneliese Spinks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Comparison of silver nylon wound dressing and silver sulfadiazine in partial burn wound therapy.

Authors:  Fereydoon Abedini; Abdollah Ahmadi; Akram Yavari; Vahid Hosseini; Sarah Mousavi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function.

Authors:  Sashwati Roy; Haytham Elgharably; Mithun Sinha; Kasturi Ganesh; Sarah Chaney; Ethan Mann; Christina Miller; Savita Khanna; Valerie K Bergdall; Heather M Powell; Charles H Cook; Gayle M Gordillo; Daniel J Wozniak; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.