Literature DB >> 9847588

[Two cases of minimally invasive reoperative coronary artery bypass].

T Oda1, T Nojima, H Ono.   

Abstract

Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are still associated with higher mortality than primary CABG. This is due in part to the potential for cardiac and patent graft injury during their dissection and the reopening of the sternum. Therefore, in two patients with recurrent angina attributable to occlusion of the old vein graft to the LAD, we performed reoperative CABG by the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedures. The left internal thoracic artery was anastomosed to the LAD through small anterolateral thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Both patients recovered fast and underwent postoperative angiogram, showing the new grafts widely patent. About two weeks later, both discharged in the conditions of nearly normal activities. The reoperative MIDCAB grafting might be expected to be as safe and promising as the primary one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847588     DOI: 10.1007/bf03217873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1344-4964


  13 in total

1.  Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  A M Calafiore; G D Giammarco; G Teodori; G Bosco; E D'Annunzio; A Barsotti; N Maddestra; L Paloscia; G Vitolla; A Sciarra; C Fino; M Contini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Coronary reoperation via small laparotomy using right gastroepiploic artery without CPB.

Authors:  J G Grandjean; M A Mariani; T Ebels
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Reoperative coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass through a small thoracotomy.

Authors:  P W Boonstra; J G Grandjean; M A Mariani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Minimally invasive versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  K B Allen; R G Matheny; R J Robison; D A Heimansohn; C J Shaar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  [Two-staged repeat myocardial revascularization through the sternal re-entry and the left thoracotomy with coronary anastomosis under the beating heart].

Authors:  T Horii; H Suma; Y Wanibuchi; S Fukuda; I Kigawa
Journal:  Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1993-09

6.  Is coronary reoperation without the pump an advantage?

Authors:  D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The effect of coronary reoperation on the survival of patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries.

Authors:  B W Lytle; F D Loop; P C Taylor; M Goormastic; R W Stewart; R Novoa; P McCarthy; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Is the internal thoracic artery the conduit of choice to replace a stenotic vein graft?

Authors:  D Navia; D M Cosgrove; B W Lytle; P C Taylor; P M McCarthy; R W Stewart; E R Rosenkranz; F D Loop
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience.

Authors:  F H Edwards; R E Clark; M Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  W J Fanning; G S Kakos; T E Williams
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.