Literature DB >> 9847275

Tidal volume reduction for prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Multicenter Trail Group on Tidal Volume reduction in ARDS.

L Brochard1, F Roudot-Thoraval, E Roupie, C Delclaux, J Chastre, E Fernandez-Mondéjar, E Clémenti, J Mancebo, P Factor, D Matamis, M Ranieri, L Blanch, G Rodi, H Mentec, D Dreyfuss, M Ferrer, C Brun-Buisson, M Tobin, F Lemaire.   

Abstract

Because animal studies have demonstrated that mechanical ventilation at high volume and pressure can be deleterious to the lungs, limitation of airway pressure, allowing hypercapnia if necessary, is already used for ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whether a systematic and more drastic reduction is necessary is debatable. A multicenter randomized study was undertaken to compare a strategy aimed at limiting the end-inspiratory plateau pressure to 25 cm H2O, using tidal volume (VT) below 10 ml/kg of body weight, versus a more conventional ventilatory approach (with regard to current practice) using VT at 10 ml/kg or above and close to normal PaCO2. Both arms used a similar level of positive end-expiratory pressure. A total of 116 patients with ARDS and no organ failure other than the lung were enrolled over 32 mo in 25 centers. The two groups were similar at inclusion. Patients in the two arms were ventilated with different VT (7.1 +/- 1.3 versus 10.3 +/- 1.7 ml/kg at Day 1, p < 0.001) and plateau pressures (25.7 +/- 5. 0 versus 31.7 +/- 6.6 cm H2O at Day 1, p < 0.001), resulting in different PaCO2 (59.5 +/- 15.0 versus 41.3 +/- 7.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and pH (7.28 +/- 0.09 versus 7.4 +/- 0.09, p < 0.001), but a similar level of oxygenation. The new approach did not reduce mortality at Day 60 (46.6% versus 37.9% in control subjects, p = 0.38), the duration of mechanical ventilation (23.1 +/- 20.2 versus 21.4 +/- 16. 3 d, p = 0.85), the incidence of pneumothorax (14% versus 12%, p = 0. 78), or the secondary occurrence of multiple organ failure (41% versus 41%, p = 1). We conclude that no benefit could be observed with reduced VT titrated to reach plateau pressures around 25 cm H2O compared with a more conventional approach in which normocapnia was achieved with plateau pressures already below 35 cm H2O.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847275     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9801044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  141 in total

Review 1.  Ventilator induced lung injury and infection in the critically ill.

Authors:  S V Baudouin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  The pulmonary physician in critical care * 7: ventilator induced lung injury.

Authors:  T Whitehead; A S Slutsky
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Suspension of the NIH ARDS Network fluids and catheters treatment trial.

Authors:  François Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  The pulmonary physician in critical care. 8: Ventilatory management of ALI/ARDS.

Authors:  J J Cordingley; B F Keogh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Barotrauma during mechanical ventilation: why aren't we seeing any more?

Authors:  Jean-Damien Ricard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Point: should positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with ARDS be set on oxygenation? Yes.

Authors:  Russell R Miller; Neil R MacIntyre; R Duncan Hite; Jonathon D Truwit; Roy G Brower; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Aissam Lyazidi; Arnaud W Thille; Guillaume Carteaux; Fabrice Galia; Laurent Brochard; Jean-Christophe M Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Arteriovenous CO2 removal improves survival compared to high frequency percussive and low tidal volume ventilation in a smoke/burn sheep acute respiratory distress syndrome model.

Authors:  Frank C Schmalstieg; Susan E Keeney; Helen E Rudloff; Kimberly H Palkowetz; Manuel Cevallos; Xiaoquin Zhou; Robert A Cox; Hal K Hawkins; Daniel L Traber; Joseph B Zwischenberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Ventilatory strategies and supportive care in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew M Luks
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Ventilatory strategies in patients with sepsis and respiratory failure.

Authors:  Dean R Hess; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.