Literature DB >> 9846588

Relationship between body fat and body mass index: differences between Indonesians and Dutch Caucasians.

S Gurrici1, Y Hartriyanti, J G Hautvast, P Deurenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between percent body fat and body mass index (BMI) in two different ethnic groups (Indonesians and Caucasians) in order to evaluate the validity of the BMI cut-off points for obesity.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: Not specially selected populations living in southern Sumatra (Palembang, Indonesia) and Caucasian Dutch living in Wageningen. MEASUREMENTS: Body weight, body height, body fat by deuterium oxide dilution and skinfold thickness.
RESULTS: Body fat could be well predicted by body mass index (BMI) and sex in the Indonesians and by BMI, sex and age in the Dutch with a prediction error of 3.6 and 3.3% for the two populations respectively. Although the body mass index in the Indonesian group was about 2 kg/m2 lower compared to the Dutch, the amount of body fat was 3% points higher. Because of small differences between the groups in age, weight and height the differences in body fat were corrected for this (ANOVA). Indonesians having the same weight, height, age and sex have generally 4.8% points more body fat compared to Dutch. Indonesians having the same % BF, age and sex have generally a 2.9 kg/m2 lower BMI compared to the Dutch.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the relationship between % BF and BMI is different between Indonesians and Dutch Caucasians. If obesity is regarded as an excess of body fat and not as an excess of weight (increased BMI), the cut-off points for obesity in Indonesia based on the BMI should be 27 kg/m2 instead of 30 kg/m2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9846588     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  32 in total

1.  Adipose Tissue Distribution and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Wendy Y Chen; Patrick T Bradshaw; Carla M Prado; Stacey Alexeeff; Kathleen B Albers; Adrienne L Castillo; Bette J Caan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The Importance of Body Composition in Explaining the Overweight Paradox in Cancer-Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Impact of body mass index on incident hypertension and diabetes in Chinese Asians, American Whites, and American Blacks: the People's Republic of China Study and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  June Stevens; Kimberly P Truesdale; Eva G Katz; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The bigger the healthier: are the limits of BMI risk changing over time?

Authors:  R Max Henderson
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Correlations between genetic variance and adiposity measures, and gene x gene interactions for obesity in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Tran Quang Binh; Yutaka Nakahori; Vu Thi Thu Hien; Nguyen Cong Khan; Nguyen Thi Lam; Le Bach Mai; Shigeru Yamamoto
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Body composition in coronary heart disease: how does body mass index correlate with body fatness?

Authors:  Alban De Schutter; Carl J Lavie; Jose Gonzalez; Richard V Milani
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Methodologies to assess paediatric adiposity.

Authors:  M Horan; E Gibney; E Molloy; F McAuliffe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Relationship of ethnicity and body mass index with the development of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  James Davis; Deborah Juarez; Krista Hodges
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.847

9.  Cut-off values of visceral fat area and waist circumference: diagnostic criteria for abdominal obesity in a Korean population.

Authors:  Jeong Ah Kim; Chang Jin Choi; Keun Sang Yum
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: comparison of WHO and NCEP criteria.

Authors:  Sung Hee Choi; Chul Woo Ahn; Bong Soo Cha; Yoon-Sok Chung; Kwan Woo Lee; Hyun Chul Lee; Kap Bum Huh; Dae Jung Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.