Literature DB >> 9845658

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of limb threatening ischemia: do the results justify an attempt before bypass grafting?

R E Parsons1, W D Suggs, J J Lee, L A Sanchez, R T Lyon, F J Veith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in selected cases have been reported to be equal or superior to those of arterial bypass graft surgery, with a lower morbidity and mortality. We performed PTA of stenotic or occlusive lesions in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, hoping to improve our overall success and decrease morbidity in this group of patients. The results of PTA in the limb-salvage setting was evaluated.
METHODS: From 1992 to 1995, 307 PTAs were performed in 257 patients. One hundred sixty-one (63%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 32 (12%) patients had renal failure. All patients were evaluated by means of pulse volume recordings and ankle brachial indices at 1 and 6 weeks after PTA and at 3 month intervals thereafter. Seventeen patients (9%) were lost to follow-up. The continued success or failure of PTA was defined by means of noninvasive vascular laboratory criteria, patency by means of pulse examination, the need for subsequent bypass grafting across the index lesion, and limb salvage.
RESULTS: The 1-year patency rates for external iliac PTAs (56%) were significantly lower (P <.05) than those for common iliac PTAs (87%). Infrainguinal PTAs at the femoral, popliteal, and tibial level had 1-year patency rates of less than 15%.
CONCLUSION: Common iliac artery PTA is justified in most cases in which it is feasible. However, when PTAs are performed below the inguinal ligament, the results are markedly worse. One-year patency rates of PTA in this group of patients with threatened limbs are inferior to the patency rates of arterial bypass grafts, even when these bypasses are performed with a prosthetic material. PTA should not be considered as a primary treatment modality for patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease who also have limb-threatening ischemia, except in unusual circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9845658     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  Functional outcome after femoral endarterectomy: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Mittal Desai; Jasmin Rimpel; Daryll M Baker; George Hamilton
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

Review 2.  Peripheral arterial disease: clinical assessment and indications for revascularization in the patient with diabetes.

Authors:  Bart E Muhs; Paul Gagne; Peter Sheehan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Predictors of failure and success of tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Nathan Fernandez; Ryan McEnaney; Luke K Marone; Robert Y Rhee; Steven Leers; Michel Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Multilevel versus isolated endovascular tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Nathan Fernandez; Ryan McEnaney; Luke K Marone; Robert Y Rhee; Steven Leers; Michel Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Shifting paradigms in the treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: a report of 1000 percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Brian G DeRubertis; Peter L Faries; James F McKinsey; Rabih A Chaer; Matthew Pierce; John Karwowski; Alan Weinberg; Roman Nowygrod; Nicholas J Morrissey; Harry L Bush; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The factors affecting recurrence of symptoms after infrainguinal arterial endovascular angioplasty.

Authors:  Mi Ju Bae; Jong Geun Lee; Sung Woon Chung; Chung Won Lee; Chang Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 7.  [Current Strategy in Endovascular Management for Below-the-Knee Arterial Lesions].

Authors:  Kyosoo Hwang; Sang Woo Park
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-05-28

8.  Clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal angioplasty in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Hyeon Min Ryu; Jung-Sun Kim; Young Guk Ko; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang; Donghoon Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 9.  The Importance of Patency in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization for Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease.

Authors:  Frederic Baumann; Christoph Ozdoba; Ernst Gröchenig; Nicolas Diehm
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-01-07

10.  IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Zeller; Iris Baumgartner; Dierk Scheinert; Marianne Brodmann; Marc Bosiers; Antonio Micari; Patrick Peeters; Frank Vermassen; Mario Landini
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.