Literature DB >> 9845577

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion-formation after bowel resection in a canine model.

E Schippers1, A Tittel, A Ottinger, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of the study was to compare adhesions following laparoscopic and conventional operations.
METHODS: In 14 dogs cecal resection and a deserosation of the abdominal wall were performed laparoscopically (n = 7) or by laparotomy (n = 7). After 8 days all dogs were reexamined and the adhesions were quantified by computer-aided measurements. The significance of any differences were tested using Student's t test.
RESULTS: The extent of adhesions after laparoscopy (630 +/- 360 mm2) and after laparotomy (3,300 +/- 1,007 mm2) differed significantly (p < 0.0001). Extensive adhesions to the abdominal incision and interenteric adhesions were found after conventional operations. Identical manipulations, such as cecal resection or deserosation of the lateral wall, led to the same frequency and extent of adhesions in both operation groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic procedures are associated with significantly less adhesions in comparison to conventional operations. Therefore the risk of adhesion-related complications should be reduced after laparoscopic operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9845577     DOI: 10.1159/000018608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  21 in total

1.  A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Polymeneas; T Theodosopoulos; A Stamatiadis; E Kourias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted ileo-colectomy for tuberculosis.

Authors:  K P Balsara; C R Shah; S Maru; R Sehgal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Growth modulation of fibroblasts by chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogel: implications for wound management?

Authors:  M Risbud; A Hardikar; R Bhonde
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Crus incision without repair is a risk factor for esophageal hiatal hernia after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eisaku Ito; Hironori Ohdaira; Keigo Nakashima; Norihiko Suzuki; Tomonori Imakita; Nobuhiro Tsutsui; Masashi Yoshida; Masaki Kitajima; Yutaka Suzuki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Diaphragmatic hernia post-minimally invasive esophagectomy: a discussion and review of literature.

Authors:  G Benjamin; A Ashfaq; Y-H Chang; K Harold; D Jaroszewski
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Mais
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The spectrum of abdominal tuberculosis in a developed country: a single institution's experience over 7 years.

Authors:  Ker-Kan Tan; Kenneth Chen; Richard Sim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Biliary drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Hong-Jie Hu; Xiao-Yan Cai; Li-Bo Li; Guan-Yu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The effect of nanotopography on modulating protein adsorption and the fibrotic response.

Authors:  Kimberly R Kam; Laura A Walsh; Suzanne M Bock; Jeremy D Ollerenshaw; Russell F Ross; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.