W R Wilson1, A E Li, D S Cowan, B G Siim. 1. Department of Pathology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand. wr.wilson@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract
PURPOSE: 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) selectively damages tumor vasculature and is currently in clinical trial as an antitumor agent. Its ability to induce synthesis of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and its apparent selectivity for poorly-perfused regions in tumors, suggests it possible use in combination with radiotherapy. This investigation examines activity of DMXAA as a radiation modifier using two murine tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor growth delay was evaluated using i.m. RIF-1 and MDAH-MCa-4 tumors irradiated in unanaesthetised, restrained mice (cobalt-60) using single dose or multiple fractions (8 x 2.5 Gy over 4 days) with DMXAA administered i.p. at various times in relation to irradiation. RESULTS: Administration of DMXAA (80 micromol/kg, i.p.) immediately after radiation resulted in a large increase in tumor growth delay, giving a radiation dose modifying factor of 2.3 for RIF-1 and 3.9 for MDAH-MCa-4. The combination was less active when radiation was given 1-4 h after DMXAA, but was highly active 12-48 h after DMXAA. At the latter times, clamping the tumor blood supply caused a large increase in radioresistance. These studies suggest that cells surviving DMXAA are hypoxic for only a short period. DMXAA increased overall growth delay when administered daily during fractionated irradiation, giving an approximately additive response. CONCLUSIONS: The marked synergy between DMXAA and single dose ionising radiation may reflect the complementarity of these agents at the microregional level, with DMXAA preferentially killing hypoxic cells in poorly perfused regions. Despite additional hypoxia shortly after DMXAA treatment, surviving cells appear to reoxygenate quickly which makes it feasible to use DMXAA before and during fractionated radiotherapy. The combination of fractionated radiation and DMXAA appears to be less effective than for single dose radiation (possibly because of the smaller contribution of hypoxia under these conditions), but may be therapeutically useful.
PURPOSE:5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) selectively damages tumor vasculature and is currently in clinical trial as an antitumor agent. Its ability to induce synthesis of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and its apparent selectivity for poorly-perfused regions in tumors, suggests it possible use in combination with radiotherapy. This investigation examines activity of DMXAA as a radiation modifier using two murinetumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor growth delay was evaluated using i.m. RIF-1 and MDAH-MCa-4 tumors irradiated in unanaesthetised, restrained mice (cobalt-60) using single dose or multiple fractions (8 x 2.5 Gy over 4 days) with DMXAA administered i.p. at various times in relation to irradiation. RESULTS: Administration of DMXAA (80 micromol/kg, i.p.) immediately after radiation resulted in a large increase in tumor growth delay, giving a radiation dose modifying factor of 2.3 for RIF-1 and 3.9 for MDAH-MCa-4. The combination was less active when radiation was given 1-4 h after DMXAA, but was highly active 12-48 h after DMXAA. At the latter times, clamping the tumor blood supply caused a large increase in radioresistance. These studies suggest that cells surviving DMXAA are hypoxic for only a short period. DMXAA increased overall growth delay when administered daily during fractionated irradiation, giving an approximately additive response. CONCLUSIONS: The marked synergy between DMXAA and single dose ionising radiation may reflect the complementarity of these agents at the microregional level, with DMXAA preferentially killing hypoxic cells in poorly perfused regions. Despite additional hypoxia shortly after DMXAA treatment, surviving cells appear to reoxygenate quickly which makes it feasible to use DMXAA before and during fractionated radiotherapy. The combination of fractionated radiation and DMXAA appears to be less effective than for single dose radiation (possibly because of the smaller contribution of hypoxia under these conditions), but may be therapeutically useful.
Authors: Ross I Berbeco; Alexandre Detappe; Panogiotis Tsiamas; David Parsons; Mammo Yewondwossen; James Robar Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lotte B Bertelsen; Yuan Yuan Shen; Thomas Nielsen; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; G Kenneth Lloyd; Dietmar W Siemann; Michael R Horsman Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Jason R Baird; Arta M Monjazeb; Omid Shah; Heather McGee; William J Murphy; Marka R Crittenden; Michael J Gough Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher B Pattillo; Berenice Venegas; Fred J Donelson; Luis Del Valle; Linda C Knight; Parkson L-G Chong; Mohammad F Kiani Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: G J S Rustin; C Bradley; S Galbraith; M Stratford; P Loadman; S Waller; K Bellenger; L Gumbrell; L Folkes; G Halbert Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-04-22 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M B Jameson; P I Thompson; B C Baguley; B D Evans; V J Harvey; D J Porter; M R McCrystal; M Small; K Bellenger; L Gumbrell; G W Halbert; P Kestell Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-06-16 Impact factor: 7.640