Literature DB >> 9844617

Improving the treatment of colorectal cancer: the role of EUS.

H Snady1, M A Merrick.   

Abstract

The two most important factors for determining the risk of local failure and overall prognosis in colorectal carcinoma are nodal status and the depth of tumor penetration into or through the bowel wall. These features have traditionally been determined pathologically because the clinical-staging accuracy of other imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) has not proven sufficiently predictive of surgical staging. However, endorectal or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can be used to preoperatively evaluate nodal involvement with an accuracy of up to 86% (median: 80%) and depth of tumor penetration through the bowel wall with an accuracy of up to 97% (median: 85%) for effective clinical staging. This high staging accuracy is useful in managing colorectal cancer. Through clinical evaluation of the initial stage of colorectal cancer with EUS, a patient's risk of disease recurrence can best be determined and patients stratified for the most appropriate treatment. EUS can be used to select patients with lesions that can be treated with local excision or sphincter-sparing surgery, often combined with radiation therapy, in situations otherwise requiring an abdominoperineal resection. EUS can also be used to preoperatively identify patients with locally advanced or unresectable disease. Chemoradiation can then be given preoperatively, when it appears to be better tolerated and more effective than postoperative treatment. Unresectable tumors can often be downstaged sufficiently to allow their excision. In resectable disease, EUS can also identify patients at high risk for recurrence who would benefit from adjuvant chemoirradiation. EUS for precise staging or for earlier diagnosis of recurrence will further improve the clinical outcome of patients with colorectal tumors as significant advances both in surgical techniques and in combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy continue to be made and applied selectively in a stage-dependent manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9844617     DOI: 10.3109/07357909809032887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  3 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Joseph W Owen; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

2.  Comparison of hydrocolonic sonograpy accuracy in preoperative staging between colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hye Won Chung; Jae Bock Chung; Seung Woo Park; Si Young Song; Jin Kyung Kang; Chan Il Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  MRI and its importance in rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 3.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.