Literature DB >> 9842791

Limitations of axis II in diagnosing personality pathology in clinical practice.

D Westen1, L Arkowitz-Westen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: DSM-IV's axis II is limited to severe personality disturbances, posing difficulty for diagnosing less severe but nonetheless clinically significant personality pathology. The authors examined the percentage of patients treated in clinical practice for personality pathology who are diagnosable with DSM-IV.
METHOD: Psychiatrists and psychologists from a random national sample provided diagnostic data on 714 patients treated for enduring, maladaptive personality patterns.
RESULTS: Only 39.4% of the patients had diagnosable axis II disorders. This percentage was relatively stable across clinicians' theoretical orientations and did not vary substantially when axis I diagnosis was controlled for.
CONCLUSIONS: DSM-IV cannot be used to diagnose most patients being treated for personality problems. The range of axis II should be broadened to encompass the range of personality pathology seen in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9842791     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.155.12.1767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  13 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of personality disorders.

Authors:  N Sater; J F Samuels; O J Bienvenu; G Nestadt
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Assessing overall functioning with adolescent inpatients.

Authors:  Greg Haggerty; Nicholas Forlenza; Charlotte Poland; Sagarika Ray; Jennifer Zodan; Ashwin Mehra; Ajay Goyal; Matthew R Baity; Caleb J Siefert; Sean Sobin; David Leite; Samuel J Sinclair
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.254

Review 3.  Current issues in the assessment of personality disorders.

Authors:  Thomas A Widiger; Kaylynn Chaynes
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Can personality disorder experts recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?

Authors:  Benjamin M Rottman; Nancy S Kim; Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  An empirically derived approach to the classification and diagnosis of mood disorders.

Authors:  Drew Westen; Johanna C Malone; Jared A DeFife
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V.

Authors:  Thomas A Widiger; Erik Simonsen; Robert Krueger; W John Livesley; Roel Verheul
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2005-06

7.  Clinicians' Use of Personality Disorder Models within a Particular Treatment Setting: A Longitudinal Comparison of Temporal Consistency and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Personal Ment Health       Date:  2011-02

8.  A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07-04

Review 9.  The relationship between eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and officially recognized eating disorders: meta-analysis and implications for DSM.

Authors:  Jennifer J Thomas; Lenny R Vartanian; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  A German version of the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) for the dimensional assessment of personality disorders.

Authors:  Anke Höflich; Marcus Rasting; Jens Mach; Silke Pless; Simon Danckworth; Christian Reimer; Manfred E Beutel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2007-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.