Literature DB >> 9842025

Failed coronary stent deployment.

W J Cantor1, C Lazzam, E A Cohen, K A Bowman, S Dolman, K Mackie, M K Natarajan, B H Strauss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary stent deployment failure may be more common in clinical practice than generally appreciated. The incidence of failed deployment in routine clinical practice and the clinical sequelae have not been described. This study sought to determine the incidence and consequences of failed coronary stent deployment and to identify clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with deployment failure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A series of 1303 consecutive procedures involving attempted coronary stenting were reviewed retrospectively. Failed stent deployment was defined as failure of the stent to be either delivered to or adequately deployed at the target lesion site. Clinical records and angiograms were reviewed and qualitative coronary angiography was performed for all cases of failed deployment. Deployment was unsuccessful in 108 (8.3%) cases involving 134 stents. Stenting was attempted as a primary procedure in 40%, as bailout in 18%, and for suboptimal angioplasty in 43% of cases. In 87% of cases, attempts were made to withdraw the stent from the coronary artery. Stent retrieval was successful in 45%, peripheral embolization occurred in 38% of patients, and in 4% the stent dislodged in the left main artery. In 35% of cases, additional stent(s) were successfully deployed. Deployment failure was associated with an overall in-hospital adverse outcome in 19% of patients, including 16% urgent coronary artery bypass grafting, 5% nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 3 in-hospital deaths. At 6-month follow-up, 39% of patients had had at least 1 adverse clinical outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat target lesion revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to deploy stents is a serious and relatively common problem that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Improved deployment strategies, including new stent designs, are required to improve procedural outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9842025     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70168-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Successful conservative treatment of an undeployed embolized intracoronary stent with dual antiplatelet and warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Layth Saleh; Mohammad Reza Movahed
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010

2.  Entrapped coronary catheter remnants and stents: must they be surgically removed?

Authors:  Konstantin Alexiou; Utz Kappert; Michael Knaut; Klaus Matschke; Sems Malte Tugtekin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Janette Greenhalgh; Juliet Hounsome; Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-23

4.  Stent dislodgement force of drug-eluting coronary stents: a bench test.

Authors:  Kyoung-Woo Seo; Hyoung-Mo Yang; Hong-Seok Lim; Myeong-Ho Yoon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

5.  Retrieval of dislodged coronary stent from left renal artery by gooseneck snare.

Authors:  Chunjian Li; Zhijian Yang; Kejiang Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2010-11

6.  Recurrent ischemia induced by unnoticed stent loss in the left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Anna Skrobisz; Marta Zaleska-Kociecka; Marcin Demkow; Adam Witkowski; Janina Stepinska
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.