Literature DB >> 9840474

The role of supplemental translaminar screws in anterior lumbar interbody fixation: a biomechanical study.

G C Rathonyi1, T R Oxland, U Gerich, S Grassmann, L P Nolte.   

Abstract

The immediate stabilization provided by anterior interbody cage fixation is often questioned. Therefore, the role of supplementary posterior fixation, particularly minimally invasive techniques such as translaminar screws, is relevant. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to determine the immediate three-dimensional flexibility of the lumbar spine, using six human cadaveric functional spinal units, in four different conditions: (1) intact, (2) fixed with translaminar screws (TLS), (3) instrumented with anterior interbody cage insertion with the BAK system and (4) instrumented with BAK cage with additional TLS fixation. Flexibility was determined in each testing condition by measuring the vertebral motions under applied pure moments (i.e. flexion-extension, bilateral axial rotation, bilateral lateral bending) in an unconstrained manner. Anterior fixation with the BAK alone provided significant stability in flexion and lateral bending. Additional posterior TLS significantly reduced the motion in extension and axial rotation. TLS fixation alone resulted in smaller rotations than BAK fixation in all loading directions. Based on these results, it seems that interbody cage fixation with the BAK system stabilizes the spine in some, but not all, loading directions. The problematic loading directions of extension and axial rotation can be substantially stabilized by using translaminar screw fixation. However, one should emphasize that the degree of stability needed to achieve solid fusion is not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9840474      PMCID: PMC3611283          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  6 in total

1.  The in vitro stabilising effect of polyetheretherketone cages versus a titanium cage of similar design for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Spruit; R G Falk; L Beckmann; T Steffen; R M Castelein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results.

Authors:  Patrick J McKenna; Brian J C Freeman; Robert C Mulholland; Michael P Grevitt; John K Webb; S H Mehdian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sang Ki Chung; Sang Ho Lee; Sang Rak Lim; Dong-Yun Kim; Jee Soo Jang; Ki-Se Nam; Ho Yeon Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanics of disc degeneration.

Authors:  V Palepu; M Kodigudla; V K Goel
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-06-17

5.  A 10-year follow-up of transpedicular screw fixation and intervertebral autogenous posterior iliac crest bone graft or intervertebral B-Twin system in failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Rafael Cincu; Francisco de Asis Lorente; Joaquin Gomez; Jose Eiras; Amit Agrawal
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of immediate stability with rectangular versus cylindrical interbody cages in stabilization of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; S M H Mehdian; Robert C Mulholland; John K Webb; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.