Literature DB >> 9840321

Insertion of internal jugular temporary hemodialysis cannulae by direct ultrasound guidance--a prospective comparison of experienced and inexperienced operators.

C C Geddes1, D Walbaum, J G Fox, R A Mactier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that inexperienced operators have a lower success rate than experienced operators for insertion of internal jugular cannulae using the anatomical landmark technique. The object of this study was to determine the rate of successful insertion, incidence of immediate complications and incidence of infection for temporary hemodialysis cannulae inserted under ultrasound guidance by experienced and inexperienced operators.
METHODS: The reason for insertion, patient age, reason for failed insertion, immediate complications, duration of cannula survival and reason for removal were recorded prospectively for 107 attempted cannulations by 7 operators in 72 subjects with renal failure. Operators were defined as "experienced" (more than 3 years postgraduate clinical experience and more than 25 previous central vein cannulae inserted) or "inexperienced" (less than 3 years postgraduate clinical experience and less than 3 previous central vein cannulae inserted). Rates of successful cannulation and incidence of complications were compared for experienced and inexperienced operators. Cannula survival without infection was analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival for experienced and inexperienced operators.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of cannula insertion at first site was 103/107 (96.3%) with no difference between experienced and inexperienced operators (56/58 vs. 47/49). 103 internal jugular temporary haemodialysis cannulae were inserted into 72 subjects. The only immediate complication was incorrect positioning of the cannula in 6 cases requiring manipulation. The median survival of hemodialysis cannulae was 14 days (range 1-111). 64.1% cannulae functioned for as long as required. Of the remainder, 33/36 were removed because of presumed cannula related infection. There was no difference in the median duration of cannula survival between experienced and inexperienced operators (15 days versus 12 days; Mann-Whitney point estimate = -1.00; 95% confidence interval -6.00, 3.00). p = 0.66) or in the probability of cannula survival without infection by Kaplan Meier analysis.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that ultrasound guided temporary haemodialysis cannulation is a safe procedure with a high rate of success, the success rate for inexperienced operators is much higher than previous studies of cannulation using the anatomical landmark technique and the rate of cannula removal due to infection is not influenced by operator experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9840321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-0430            Impact factor:   0.975


  9 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Norair Airapetian; Julien Maizel; François Langelle; Santhi Samy Modeliar; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Herve Dupont; Michel Slama
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsotsolis; Katerina Tsirgogianni; Ioannis Kioumis; Georgia Pitsiou; Sofia Baka; Antonis Papaiwannou; Anastasia Karavergou; Aggeliki Rapti; Georgia Trakada; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Ilias Karapantzos; Chrysanthi Karapantzou; Nikos Barbetakis; Athanasios Zissimopoulos; Ivan Kuhajda; Dejan Andjelkovic; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  The effects of the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva manoeuvre on internal jugular vein diameter and placement in children.

Authors:  Gamze Naime Dincyurek; Elif Basagan Mogol; Gurkan Turker; Belgin Yavascaoglu; Alp Gurbet; Fatma Nur Kaya; Bachri Ramadan Moustafa; Tolga Yazici
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Impact of ultrasonography on central venous catheter insertion in intensive care.

Authors:  Gopal B Palepu; Juneja Deven; M Subrahmanyam; S Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

5.  Should temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion remain a requirement of nephrology residency training?

Authors:  Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2015-03-05

Review 6.  Non anti-coagulant factors associated with filter life in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Brain; Elizabeth Winson; Owen Roodenburg; John McNeil
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Lymphorrhea: An Unusual Complication of Jugular Venous Catheterization for Hemodialysis.

Authors:  D Bajpai; T E Jamale; N K Hase; S B Thakare; R B Deshpande; S J Patil
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis-the Myth and the Evidence.

Authors:  Mohammad Ahsan Sohail; Tushar J Vachharajani; Evamaria Anvari
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-10-11

9.  Placement of hemodialysis catheters with a technical, functional, and anatomical viewpoint.

Authors:  Zeki Aydin; Meltem Gursu; Sami Uzun; Serhat Karadag; Emel Tatli; Abdullah Sumnu; Savas Ozturk; Rumeyza Kazancioglu
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.