OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of low-dose theophylline on urine output and the urinary adenosine: cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) excretion ratio (a measure of phosphodiesterase inhibition) in diuretic-dependent critically ill children. DESIGN: Observational clinical case series and animal laboratory experiment. SETTING: A university pediatric intensive care unit and a pharmacology research laboratory. PATIENTS: 10 consecutive oliguric patients treated with theophylline for diuresis. INTERVENTIONS: Urine output, fluid intake, diuretic dosages, and number of pressors (including dopamine) were monitored over the 24-h period prior to and the 24-h period immediately after theophylline was started. Hourly collections of urine were obtained at baseline and 1 and 3 h after theophylline was started and urinary excretion rates of adenosine and cAMP were measured and calculated. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean theophylline level in the children was 5.0 microg/ml. Urine output increased from 1.58 +/- 0.46 to 3.75 +/- 0.77 ml/kg per h (p = 0.008, paired t-test) after theophylline administration. There was no significant change in fluid intake, vasoactive agents, or dosages of other diuretics during the study periods. Intrarenal infusion of the IC50 concentration of isobutylmethylxanthine for phosphodiesterase activity resulted in a reduction of the adenosine: cAMP urinary excretion ratio in rats (p < 0.05). Low-dose theophylline had no effect on the adenosine: cAMP urinary excretion ratio in children. Concurrent therapy with dopamine was associated with an enhanced diuretic effect of theophylline (with dopamine, 1.30 +/- 0.30 to 5.07 +/- 0.77 ml/kg per h vs without dopamine, 1.77 +/- 0.76 to 2.86 +/- 1.08 ml/kg per h; p = 0.03, two-way ANOVA). There was no interaction between dopamine and low-dose theophylline on the urinary adenosine: cAMP excretion ratio (p = 0.56, two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline increased urine output in diuretic-dependent critically ill children and the diuretic effect may have been potentiated by concurrent use of dopamine. Adenosine receptor antagonism may be a more likely mechanism for the diuretic effect of theophylline than phosphodiesterase inhibition.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of low-dose theophylline on urine output and the urinary adenosine: cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) excretion ratio (a measure of phosphodiesterase inhibition) in diuretic-dependent critically ill children. DESIGN: Observational clinical case series and animal laboratory experiment. SETTING: A university pediatric intensive care unit and a pharmacology research laboratory. PATIENTS: 10 consecutive oliguric patients treated with theophylline for diuresis. INTERVENTIONS: Urine output, fluid intake, diuretic dosages, and number of pressors (including dopamine) were monitored over the 24-h period prior to and the 24-h period immediately after theophylline was started. Hourly collections of urine were obtained at baseline and 1 and 3 h after theophylline was started and urinary excretion rates of adenosine and cAMP were measured and calculated. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean theophylline level in the children was 5.0 microg/ml. Urine output increased from 1.58 +/- 0.46 to 3.75 +/- 0.77 ml/kg per h (p = 0.008, paired t-test) after theophylline administration. There was no significant change in fluid intake, vasoactive agents, or dosages of other diuretics during the study periods. Intrarenal infusion of the IC50 concentration of isobutylmethylxanthine for phosphodiesterase activity resulted in a reduction of the adenosine: cAMP urinary excretion ratio in rats (p < 0.05). Low-dose theophylline had no effect on the adenosine: cAMP urinary excretion ratio in children. Concurrent therapy with dopamine was associated with an enhanced diuretic effect of theophylline (with dopamine, 1.30 +/- 0.30 to 5.07 +/- 0.77 ml/kg per h vs without dopamine, 1.77 +/- 0.76 to 2.86 +/- 1.08 ml/kg per h; p = 0.03, two-way ANOVA). There was no interaction between dopamine and low-dose theophylline on the urinary adenosine: cAMP excretion ratio (p = 0.56, two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS:Theophylline increased urine output in diuretic-dependent critically ill children and the diuretic effect may have been potentiated by concurrent use of dopamine. Adenosine receptor antagonism may be a more likely mechanism for the diuretic effect of theophylline than phosphodiesterase inhibition.
Authors: Ali Mirza Onder; David Rosen; Charles Mullett; Lesley Cottrell; Sherry Kanosky; Oulimata Kane Grossman; Hafiz Imran Iqbal; Eric Seachrist; Lennie Samsell; Kelly Gustafson; Larry Rhodes; Robert Gustafson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Bethany A Lynch; Peter Gal; J Laurence Ransom; Rita Q Carlos; Mary Ann V T Dimaguila; McCrae S Smith; John E Wimmer; Mitchell D Imm Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-04
Authors: Paul Van Siang Lian Mang; Jun Chuen Hui; Rachel Si Jing Tan; M Shahnaz Hasan; Yao Mun Choo; Mohammed F Abosamak; Ka Ting Ng Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 3.860
Authors: David M Axelrod; Scott M Sutherland; Andrew Anglemyer; Paul C Grimm; Stephen J Roth Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Katie Park; Lindsay C Trout; Cong Xu; Ming Wang; Robert F Tamburro; E Scott Halstead Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Robert F Tamburro; Neal J Thomas; Gary D Ceneviva; Michael D Dettorre; Gretchen L Brummel; Steven E Lucking Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.418