Literature DB >> 9839983

Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on MR images using current techniques.

S Worawattanakul1, R C Semelka, T C Noone, B F Calvo, N L Kelekis, J T Woosley.   

Abstract

This study describes the spectrum of appearances of cholangiocarcinoma on magnetic resonance (MR) sequences, including gadolinium-enhanced, fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo images and MR cholangiography. Fifteen patients were included in the study. Histologic diagnosis was established in 11 patients by surgical resection (6 patients), percutaneous biopsy (4 patients), and open liver biopsy (1 patient). The final diagnosis was determined by correlation of the MR findings with cholangiographic studies and laboratory studies in 4 patients. MR studies were performed at 1.5 T, and the following sequences were obtained: T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin echo or SGE, T2-weighted fat-suppressed conventional or turbo spin echo, MR cholangiography, and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed SGE images. The following determinations were made: tumor location, tumor extent, ductal dilatation, ductal wall thickness, signal intensity, enhancement pattern, and associated findings. Mass-like neoplasms were peripheral (6 patients), hilar (1 patient), and extrahepatic (2 patients). Circumferential tumors were hilar (2 patients) and extrahepatic (4 patients). All peripheral tumors were multifocal. Mass-like tumors were well-defined, rounded, and ranged from 1 to 14 cm in diameter. Circumferential tumors had less well-defined margins and measured from 3 to 15 mm in thickness. All mass-like tumors were moderately hypointense on T1-weighted images and mildly to moderately hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The circumferential tumors were iso- to moderately hypointense on T1-weighted images and iso- to mildly hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Mass-like tumors were generally well shown on non-contrast and immediate gadolinium-enhanced images, whereas circumferential tumors were poorly seen on non-contrast images and best shown on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed images. The degree of enhancement ranged from minimal to intense on immediate gadolinium-enhanced images, with all tumors becoming more homogeneous in signal intensity on images obtained between 1 and 5 min following contrast administration. Tumor-containing lymph nodes greater than or equal to 1 cm in diameter were demonstrated in 11 out of 15 patients (73.3%). These were best shown on T2-weighted fat-suppressed images and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed SGE images. MR cholangiography demonstrated the level of obstruction and degree of dilatation of the proximal biliary system in 5 out of 6 patients who underwent MR cholangiography. The spectrum of appearances of cholangiocarcinoma is demonstrable on MR images. Mass-like tumors are well shown on both pre- and post-gadolinium sequences. Circumferential tumors may cause minimally increased duct wall thickness and are most clearly shown on gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed SGE images obtained 1 to 5 min following gadolinium administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9839983     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00135-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

1.  Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Wolfram O Schwarz; Matthias Heller; Christopher Herzog; Stephan Zangos; Rainer E Hintze; Peter Neuhaus; Renate M Hammerstingl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Multimodality imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kelly Fábrega-Foster; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Timothy M Pawlik; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  The role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating benign from malignant bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Park; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Mi Jang; Seo-youn Choi; Soon Jin Lee; Dongil Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [MRT of the liver. Clinical significance of nonspecific and liver-specific MRT contrast agents].

Authors:  A Ba-Ssalamah; B Happel; J Kettenbach; A Dirisamer; F Wrba; F Längle; W Schima
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Martin Uffmann; Sanjai Saini; Nina Bastati; Christian Herold; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Stanislas-H Morin; Adrian-Kp Lim; Jeremy-Fl Cobbold; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Young-Jin Kim; Mijin Yun; Woo Jung Lee; Kyung Sik Kim; Jong Doo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katrina A Vanderveen; Hero K Hussain
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and the effect of biliary function on signal intensity.

Authors:  Shi-Ting Feng; Ling Wu; Huasong Cai; Tao Chan; Yanji Luo; Zhi Dong; Keguo Zheng; Zi-Ping Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.