Literature DB >> 9839841

Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running.

V Wank1, U Frick, D Schmidtbleicher.   

Abstract

Treadmills are often used in research to analyse kinematic and physiological variables. The success of transfering the results to overground running depends on the comparability of the values between the two situations. The aim of the present study was to compare the kinematics and muscle activities in overground and treadmill running. Ten male physical education students with experience in treadmill running were asked to run with a speed of 4.0 and 6.0 m/s both overground and on a Woodway treadmill. The 3D-kinematics of the limbs were studied using a two camera video tracking system. Additionally the surface EMG of six lower limb muscles and the pattern of ground contact of the right foot was registered. Both the activities of the leg muscles and several kinematic variables showed systematic changes from overground to treadmill running. On the treadmill the subjects favoured a type of running that provided them with a higher level of security. The swing amplitude of the leg, the vertical displacement and the variance in vertical and horizontal velocity were lower in treadmill running. The angle between shoe sole and ground at foot impact was also lower and the forward lean of the upper body was higher in running on the treadmill compared with the overground mode. Most of the subjects reduced their step length and increased stride frequency in treadmill running. Furthermore, the contact time in treadmill running was shorter than for overground running. The above mentioned kinematic variables were significantly different (p < 0.05). The EMG patterns of the leg muscles were generally similar between overground and treadmill modes, but some minor differences could consistently be identified.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9839841     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-971944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  27 in total

1.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand.

Authors:  Hugh C Pinnington; David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier; Brian Dawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Decrease in eccentric hamstring strength in runners in the Tirol Speed Marathon.

Authors:  A Koller; G Sumann; W Schobersberger; H Hoertnagl; C Haid
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Physiological responses to nordic walking, walking and jogging.

Authors:  Thorsten Schiffer; Axel Knicker; Uwe Hoffman; Brigitte Harwig; Wildor Hollmann; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  A direct comparison of local dynamic stability during unperturbed standing and walking.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Kang; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; Kurt Manal; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  Compensation for the effects of head acceleration on jaw movement in speech.

Authors:  D M Shiller; D J Ostry; P L Gribble; R Laboissière
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Are overground or treadmill runners more likely to sustain tibial stress fracture?

Authors:  C Milgrom; A Finestone; S Segev; C Olin; T Arndt; I Ekenman
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.

Authors:  Donald L Goss; Michael Lewek; Bing Yu; William B Ware; Deydre S Teyhen; Michael T Gross
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Increasing running step rate reduces patellofemoral joint forces.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Darryl G Thelen; Christa M Wille; Elizabeth S Chumanov; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.