AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil HCl (5 mg) in patients with impaired hepatic function, following the administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil in male volunteers with chronic compensated cirrhosis of the liver (n = 10) to that in healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 10). Each subject received a single 5 mg oral dose of donepezil. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were taken at specified intervals up to 120-h post-dose. Concentrations of donepezil in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in donepezil pharmacokinetics were observed between hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects, with the exception of Cmax. The hepatically impaired patients showed a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, higher mean Cmax value of 6.6 ng ml(-1) compared with the control group, which had a mean Cmax value of 4.8 ng ml(-1) (P=(0.022). This represented an increase of 37.5%. The observed changes in AUC values were smaller and not statistically different. The AUC(0-120) and AUC(0-infinity) were 7% and 21% larger in the hepatically impaired patients than in the normal subjects, respectively, although clearance and volume of distribution were almost identical in the two groups. The t1/2 increased by 20%, but this change was also not statistically significant. Donepezil was equally well tolerated by all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that compromised hepatic function does not produce clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of donepezil following single-dose administration. These results suggest that the administration of donepezil to patients with hepatic disease in clinical practice should not require any dosing modifications.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil HCl (5 mg) in patients with impaired hepatic function, following the administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil in male volunteers with chronic compensated cirrhosis of the liver (n = 10) to that in healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 10). Each subject received a single 5 mg oral dose of donepezil. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were taken at specified intervals up to 120-h post-dose. Concentrations of donepezil in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in donepezil pharmacokinetics were observed between hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects, with the exception of Cmax. The hepatically impaired patients showed a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, higher mean Cmax value of 6.6 ng ml(-1) compared with the control group, which had a mean Cmax value of 4.8 ng ml(-1) (P=(0.022). This represented an increase of 37.5%. The observed changes in AUC values were smaller and not statistically different. The AUC(0-120) and AUC(0-infinity) were 7% and 21% larger in the hepatically impaired patients than in the normal subjects, respectively, although clearance and volume of distribution were almost identical in the two groups. The t1/2 increased by 20%, but this change was also not statistically significant. Donepezil was equally well tolerated by all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that compromised hepatic function does not produce clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of donepezil following single-dose administration. These results suggest that the administration of donepezil to patients with hepatic disease in clinical practice should not require any dosing modifications.
Authors: A Ohnishi; M Mihara; H Kamakura; Y Tomono; J Hasegawa; K Yamazaki; N Morishita; T Tanaka Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Josephine F Reyes; Ramon Vargas; Dinesh Kumar; Edward I Cullen; Carlos A Perdomo; Raymond D Pratt Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.335