M A Smith1, J A Fine, R L Barnhill, M Berwick. 1. Division of Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455-0381, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence linking female hormones to the development of malignant melanoma has been contradictory. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of melanoma in relation to exogenous and endogenous hormonal variables in women, including oral contraceptives, replacement oestrogens, pregnancy, and menopause. METHODS: Hormonal and reproductive factors were evaluated using data from a personal-interview population-based case-control study of melanoma in women conducted in Connecticut during 1987-1989. Caucasian female incident invasive melanoma cases (n = 308) were confirmed by standardized histopathological review. Caucasian female controls (n = 233) were selected by random digit dialling and frequency-matched on age. Data were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Ever being pregnant, age at first pregnancy, current use of replacement oestrogens, ever use of oral contraceptives, duration of use of oral contraceptives, and age at first use of oral contraceptives were not associated with melanoma. Among other variables, cases were more than twice as likely as controls to report a single pregnancy lasting >6 months, but this association lacked a dose-response relationship. Menopause and body mass index were not independently associated with risk of melanoma. However, this analysis did suggest that menopause and body mass index may be interactive risk factors. Melanoma cases were three times more likely than controls to be obese and report natural menopause when compared to thin/acceptable premenopausal women (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.03-8.73). CONCLUSIONS: These data do not provide strong evidence that hormonal and reproductive factors are associated with risk of melanoma in women, although the few positive results should be explored further.
BACKGROUND: Evidence linking female hormones to the development of malignant melanoma has been contradictory. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of melanoma in relation to exogenous and endogenous hormonal variables in women, including oral contraceptives, replacement oestrogens, pregnancy, and menopause. METHODS: Hormonal and reproductive factors were evaluated using data from a personal-interview population-based case-control study of melanoma in women conducted in Connecticut during 1987-1989. Caucasian female incident invasive melanoma cases (n = 308) were confirmed by standardized histopathological review. Caucasian female controls (n = 233) were selected by random digit dialling and frequency-matched on age. Data were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Ever being pregnant, age at first pregnancy, current use of replacement oestrogens, ever use of oral contraceptives, duration of use of oral contraceptives, and age at first use of oral contraceptives were not associated with melanoma. Among other variables, cases were more than twice as likely as controls to report a single pregnancy lasting >6 months, but this association lacked a dose-response relationship. Menopause and body mass index were not independently associated with risk of melanoma. However, this analysis did suggest that menopause and body mass index may be interactive risk factors. Melanoma cases were three times more likely than controls to be obese and report natural menopause when compared to thin/acceptable premenopausal women (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.03-8.73). CONCLUSIONS: These data do not provide strong evidence that hormonal and reproductive factors are associated with risk of melanoma in women, although the few positive results should be explored further.
Entities:
Keywords:
Americas; Biology; Body Weight--women; Case Control Studies; Connecticut; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Factors; Dermatological Effects--women; Developed Countries; Diseases; Family Planning; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Menopause; Neoplasms--women; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives; Parity; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Factors; Studies; United States
Authors: Kyoko Miura; Michael S Zens; Tessa Peart; Elizabeth A Holly; Marianne Berwick; Richard P Gallagher; Thomas M Mack; J Mark Elwood; Margaret R Karagas; Adèle C Green Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Jean Y Tang; Katrina M Spaunhurst; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Elizabeth Keiser; Fridtjof Thomas; Matthew L Anderson; Nathalie C Zeitouni; Joseph C Larson; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Catherine M Olsen; Michael S Zens; Adele C Green; Therese A Stukel; C D'Arcy J Holman; Thomas Mack; J Mark Elwood; Elizabeth A Holly; Carlotta Sacerdote; Richard Gallagher; Anthony J Swerdlow; Bruce K Armstrong; Stefano Rosso; Connie Kirkpatrick; Roberto Zanetti; Julia Newton Bishop; Veronique Bataille; Yu-Mei Chang; Rona Mackie; Anne Østerlind; Marianne Berwick; Margaret R Karagas; David C Whiteman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Catherine M Olsen; Michael S Zens; Therese A Stukel; Carlotta Sacerdote; Yu-Mei Chang; Bruce K Armstrong; Veronique Bataille; Marianne Berwick; J Mark Elwood; Elizabeth A Holly; Connie Kirkpatrick; Thomas Mack; Julia Newton Bishop; Anne Østerlind; Anthony J Swerdlow; Roberto Zanetti; Adèle C Green; Margaret R Karagas; David C Whiteman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: M R Karagas; T A Stukel; J Dykes; J Miglionico; M A Greene; M Carey; B Armstrong; J M Elwood; R P Gallagher; A Green; E A Holly; C S Kirkpatrick; T Mack; A Østerlind; S Rosso; A J Swerdlow Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-04-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Monique K van der Kooij; Marjolein J A L Wetzels; Maureen J B Aarts; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Christian U Blank; Marye J Boers-Sonderen; Miranda P Dierselhuis; Jan Willem B de Groot; Geke A P Hospers; Djura Piersma; Rozemarijn S van Rijn; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Albert J Ten Tije; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Michel W J M Wouters; John B A G Haanen; Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh; Esther Bastiaannet; Ellen Kapiteijn Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 6.639