Literature DB >> 9839223

Growth enhancement of Bifidobacterium lactis Bo and Lactobacillus acidophilus Ki by milk hydrolyzates.

A M Gomes1, F X Malcata, F A Klaver.   

Abstract

The determination of the best conditions of preparation of a (tentatively) probiotic starter culture that might be suitable for cheese making composed solely of Bifidobacterium lactis Bo and Lactobacillus acidophilus Ki is critical if a consistently reliable acid production is to be achieved, especially because bifidobacteria have stringent requirements for growth. Therefore, we determined whether B. lactis Bo and L. acidophilus Ki required or benefitted from the addition of milk hydrolyzates (brought about by proteinase or neutrase as the nitrogen source). The growth and acid production of B. lactis in milk were affected by the addition of proteinase-mediated hydrolyzate and, to a lesser extent, by neutrase-mediated hydrolyzate; a higher degree of hydrolysis of either hydrolyzate resulted in greater biomass increase and greater acid production. This result suggests that the poor growth of bifidobacteria in milk is due partially to the lack of small peptides and free amino acids. The rates of growth and acidification by B. lactis were enhanced when cocultured with L. acidophilus (1:1 inoculum ratio). Conversely, the growth rates and acid production of L. acidophilus were not positively affected by the addition of either milk hydrolyzate. Although L. acidophilus grew slowly, its proteolytic system was apparently able to generate its own nitrogen source. Nevertheless, coculture with B. lactis (1:1 inoculum ratio) led to enhanced rates of growth and acidification when compared with that of the single strain, suggesting some degree of symbiosis between the strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9839223     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75840-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  A repeated batch process for cultivation of Bifidobacterium longum.

Authors:  S-L Her; K-J Duan; D-C Sheu; C-T Lin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus Bauer and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB12 on proteolytic changes in dry-cured loins.

Authors:  Anna Okoń; Joanna Stadnik; Zbigniew Józef Dolatowski
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Separation of growth-stimulating peptides for Bifidobacterium from soybean conglycinin.

Authors:  Wei-Yong Zuo; Wei-Hua Chen; Si-Xiang Zou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Development of probiotic yogurt: effect of strain combination on nutritional, rheological, organoleptic and probiotic properties.

Authors:  Richa Soni; Nayan K Jain; Vidhi Shah; Jinal Soni; Dipali Suthar; Priyal Gohel
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 5.  Consumption of human milk glycoconjugates by infant-associated bifidobacteria: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Daniel Garrido; David C Dallas; David A Mills
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  The effect of rice fibre fractions on the growth of co-cultures of probiotics.

Authors:  Warnakulasuriya Mary Ann Dipika Binosha Fernando; Steve Flint; Maggi Zou; Charles S Brennan; Kamburawala K D S Ranaweera; Arthur Bamunuarachchi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Genomic and proteomic comparisons of bacteriocins in probiotic species Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and inhibitory ability of Escherichia coli MG 1655.

Authors:  Nasrin Darvishi; Najaf Allahyari Fard; Maryam Sadrnia
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.