Literature DB >> 9837708

Dimeric lac repressors exhibit phase-dependent co-operativity.

J Müller1, A Barker, S Oehler, B Müller-Hill.   

Abstract

Transcription of the lac operon in Escherichia coli is repressed by the binding of Lac repressor (LacR) to lac operator O1, a pseudo-palindromic sequence centred 11 bp downstream of the transcription start. Full repression of the wild-type promoter by wild-type, tetrameric LacR requires the presence of at least two operator sequences that must not only be in close proximity to O1, 401 bp and 92 bp for the auxiliary operators O2 and O3, respectively, but must also be present on the same side of the DNA helix. LacR mutants lacking the C-terminal heptad repeat and thus only capable of dimer formation still repress, but at a much reduced level. Their repression of the lac promoter is comparable to repression by tetrameric LacR when both auxiliary operators are destroyed. We have examined the residual repression, by dimeric LacR, of a series of constructs containing a CAP-independent promoter and two lac operators, O1 and Oid, separated by a series of spacers increasing in size by single base-pair increments. Surprisingly, repression of these constructs still exhibits phase dependence. The periodicity of maxima is similar to the helical repeat of DNA in vivo, as measured by phase-dependent repression with tetrameric LacR, although the magnitude of repression is much smaller than that obtained in previous experiments with tetrameric LacR. Two additional variants of dimeric LacR with altered C termini that were tested also show phase dependence. Control experiments show that the presence of O1 is required for repression in this system. In the absence of O1, occupancy of the auxiliary operator does not lead to repression. The magnitudes of repression maxima correlate best with the overall basic nature of the C terminus. Weak, unspecific contacts by this region with DNA seem sufficient to explain the observed periodicity. It remains to be seen whether additional factors are also involved in this residual repression. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9837708     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  13 in total

1.  DNA trajectory in the Gal repressosome.

Authors:  Szabolcs Semsey; Michail Y Tolstorukov; Konstantin Virnik; Victor B Zhurkin; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Target immunity of the Tn3-family transposon Tn4430 requires specific interactions between the transposase and the terminal inverted repeats of the transposon.

Authors:  Emilien Nicolas; Michaël Lambin; Bernard Hallet
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Exact theory of kinkable elastic polymers.

Authors:  Paul A Wiggins; Rob Phillips; Philip C Nelson
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-02-23

Review 4.  Biological consequences of tightly bent DNA: the other life of a macromolecular celebrity.

Authors:  Hernan G Garcia; Paul Grayson; Lin Han; Mandar Inamdar; Jané Kondev; Philip C Nelson; Rob Phillips; Jonathan Widom; Paul A Wiggins
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Substitutions at auxiliary operator O3 enhance repression by nitrate-responsive regulator NarL at synthetic lac control regions in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Valley Stewart; Peggy J Bledsoe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Effects of the nucleoid protein HU on the structure, flexibility, and ring-closure properties of DNA deduced from Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Luke Czapla; David Swigon; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Kristen M Schwingen; Joshua J Riepe; Chamitha J Weeramange; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Bacterial promoter repression by DNA looping without protein-protein binding competition.

Authors:  Nicole A Becker; Alexander M Greiner; Justin P Peters; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Novel insights from hybrid LacI/GalR proteins: family-wide functional attributes and biologically significant variation in transcription repression.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Michael W Manley; Nicole A Becker; Jacob A Hessman; L James Maher; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Spacing between core recognition motifs determines relative orientation of AraR monomers on bipartite operators.

Authors:  Deepti Jain; Deepak T Nair
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.