Literature DB >> 983725

Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus.

A R Moller.   

Abstract

The dynamic properties of the responses of single primary auditory fibers were compared with those of single cells in the cochlear nucleus. The stimuli were tones (at the unit's characteristic frequency, CF) that were amplitude-modulated with pseudorandom noise. The dynamic properties were described by the cross-covariance and integrated cross-covariance functions between the recorded discharge rate and the modulation. These two measures have earlier been shown to be valid approximations of the system's impulse and step response function, i.e. the change in discharge rate in response to a short impulsive increase (or decrease) in the stimulus intensity and a step increment (or decrement) in the stimulus intensity. The cross-covariance function computed from the responses of fibers had a narrower peak than that of cells indicating that a brief change in stimulus intensity gives rise to a faster change in the discharge rate of fibers than that of cells. The nodulation of the discharge rate of cells for a certain degree of amplitude modulation of the sound is usually greater than that of cells. The modulation of the discharge rate of cells for a certain degree of amplitude modulation of the sound is usually greater than that of fibers. The range of stimulus intensities where a change in stimulus intensity gives rise to a change in discharge rate rate is smaller for fibers (about 30 dB) than what was shown earlier for cells (70-80 dB). The cross-covariance function computed from the slow wave responses recorded from the surface of the cochlear nucleus in response to an amplitude-modulated tone has individual peaks that reflect distinct classes of units with regard to latency of unit dishcarges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 983725     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6772


  11 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dynamic encoding of amplitude-modulated sounds at the level of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  L K Rimskaya-Korsakova; V N Telepnev; N A Dubrovksii
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01

3.  Linear and nonlinear models of the basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  H G Nilsson; A R Moller
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1977-08-03       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Responses of single neurons in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: linear amplitude modulations.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Coding of sinusoidally amplitude modulated acoustic stimuli in the inferior colliculus of the rufous horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi.

Authors:  K Reimer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Neural delay in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  A R Møller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential encoding of rapid changes in sound amplitude by second-order auditory neurons.

Authors:  R D Frisina; R L Smith; S C Chamberlain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Encoding of rapid amplitude fluctuations by Cochlear-nerve fibres in the guinea-pig.

Authors:  A R Palmer
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1982

9.  Neural adaptation to tone sequences in the songbird forebrain: patterns, determinants, and relation to the build-up of auditory streaming.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Response properties and tonotopical organization in the dorsal cochlear nucleus in rats.

Authors:  Y Yajima; Y Hayashi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.