Literature DB >> 9836156

Alcohol versus natural drying for newborn cord care.

S Dore1, D Buchan, S Coulas, L Hamber, M Stewart, D Cowan, L Jamieson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare alcohol cleaning and natural drying of newborn umbilical cords.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Tertiary-level university teaching hospital and level II community hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1,876 singleton full-term newborns enrolled, 1,811 completed the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Newborns, from birth until separation of the cord, were randomized to either (a) umbilical cleansing with 70% isopropyl alcohol at each diaper change or (b) natural drying of the umbilical site without special treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Umbilical infection, cord separation time, maternal comfort, and cost.
RESULTS: No newborn in either group developed a cord infection. Primary care providers obtained cultures for cord concerns in 32 newborns (1.8%), with colonization for normal flora, Staphylococcus aureus, and Group B streptococcus proportionately equal in alcohol and air dry groups. Cord separation time was statistically significantly different (alcohol group, 9.8 days; natural drying group, 8.16 days; t = 8.9, p = < .001). Mothers described similar comfort with cord care and relief with cord separation. Costs of alcohol drying while in the hospital were greater than those of natural drying.
CONCLUSIONS: (a) Evidence does not support continued use of alcohol for newborn cord care; (b) health care providers should explain the normal process of cord separation, including appearance and possible odor; and (c) health care providers should continue to develop evidence to support or eliminate historic practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9836156     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02631.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  9 in total

1.  Advice given to women in Argentina about breast-feeding and the use of alcohol.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2004-12

2.  Comparison of olive oil and dry-clean keeping methods in umbilical cord care as microbiological.

Authors:  Ayten Sentürk Erenel; Gülşen Vural; Sengül Yaman Efe; Semiha Ozkan; Selda Ozgen; Rabiye Erenoğlu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-11

Review 3.  Topical umbilical cord care at birth.

Authors:  J Zupan; P Garner; A A A Omari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

4.  Umbilical cord care: a pilot study comparing topical human milk, povidone-iodine, and dry care.

Authors:  Gulsen Vural; Sezer Kisa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Role of antimicrobial applications to the umbilical cord in neonates to prevent bacterial colonization and infection: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Luke C Mullany; Gary L Darmstadt; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  70% Alcohol Versus Dry Cord Care in the Umbilical Cord Care: A Case-Control Study in Italy.

Authors:  Rosanna Quattrin; Kim Iacobucci; Anna Lisa De Tina; Letizia Gallina; Carla Pittini; Silvio Brusaferro
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Umbilical cord separation time, predictors and healing complications in newborns with dry care.

Authors:  María Dolores López-Medina; Ana Belén López-Araque; Manuel Linares-Abad; Isabel María López-Medina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.

Authors:  Aamer Imdad; Resti Ma M Bautista; Kathlynne Anne A Senen; Ma Esterlita V Uy; Jacinto Blas Mantaring; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-31

9.  Comparing the Impact of Topical Application of Human Milk and Chlorhexidine on Cord Separation Time in Newborns.

Authors:  Fatemeh Abbaszadeh; Zanab Hajizadeh; Mohammad Jahangiri
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.