Literature DB >> 9833007

Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.

R A Bevins1, J E Klebaur, M T Bardo.   

Abstract

Rats were pre-tested in several individual difference screens--novelty-induced activity, novelty-induced place preference, novel-object interaction, and amphetamine-induced activity. Rats that were more sensitive to the locomotor effects of amphetamine were more active in an inescapable novel environment and displayed a greater preference for a novel environment. All animals were then trained to discriminate amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline in a two-bar discrimination procedure using food-maintained responding. After acquisition of the discrimination (mean = 37 trials), two amphetamine generalization tests (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) were conducted. In the second generalization test, rats that were more sensitive to the activating effect of amphetamine were also more sensitive to the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine (i.e. lower median effective dose). Moreover, high responders in the novelty-induced activity and novelty-induced place preference screens were more sensitive than low responders to the bar-press suppressant effects of amphetamine in the first generalization test. The relationships are discussed in terms of identifying processes common to the screens (e.g. stress and reward).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9833007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  23 in total

Review 1.  Novelty Seeking and Drug Addiction in Humans and Animals: From Behavior to Molecules.

Authors:  Taylor Wingo; Tanseli Nesil; Jung-Seok Choi; Ming D Li
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Within-animal comparisons of novelty and cocaine neuronal ensemble overlap in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Natalie N Nawarawong; Christopher M Olsen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Chronic variable stress and intravenous methamphetamine self-administration - Role of individual differences in behavioral and physiological reactivity to novelty.

Authors:  S B Taylor; L R Watterson; P R Kufahl; N E Nemirovsky; S E Tomek; C D Conrad; M F Olive
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; T H Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Alcohol during adolescence selectively alters immediate and long-term behavior and neurochemistry.

Authors:  Antoniette M Maldonado-Devincci; Kimberly A Badanich; Cheryl L Kirstein
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.405

6.  Modulation of meso-limbic reward processing by motivational tendencies in young adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Xun Zhu; Donald Lynam; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A comparison of amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats: evidence for qualitative differences in behavior.

Authors:  Darien A Hall; Jessica J Stanis; Hector Marquez Avila; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Pavlovian discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Destiny L Singleton; Chana K Akins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption.

Authors:  Y Pelloux; J Costentin; D Duterte-Boucher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. II. Agonist-induced antinociception and antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption.

Authors:  David A White; Mikhail Kalinichev; Stephen G Holtzman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.