Literature DB >> 9832025

Theoretical modelling of arteriovenous malformation rupture risk: a feasibility and validation study.

E Gao1, W L Young, G J Hademenos, T F Massoud, R R Sciacca, Q Ma, S Joshi, H Mast, J P Mohr, S Vulliemoz, J Pile-Spellman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of using a theoretical computational model to simulate the risk of spontaneous arteriovenous malformation (AVM) haemorrhage.
METHODS: Data from 12 patients were collected from a prospective databank which documented the angioarchitecture and morphological characteristics of the AVM and the feeding mean arterial pressure (FMAP) measured during initial superselective angiography prior to any treatment. Using the data, a computational model of the cerebral circulation and the AVM was constructed for each patient (patient-specific model). Two model risk (Risk(model)) calculations (haemodynamic- and structural-weighted estimates) were performed by using the patient-specific models. In our previously developed method of haemodynamic-weighted estimate, Risk(model) was calculated with the simulated intranidal pressures related to its maximal and minimal values. In the method of structural-weighted estimate developed and described in this paper, the vessel mechanical properties and probability calculation were considered in more detail than in the haemodynamic-weighted estimate. Risk(model) was then compared to experimentally determined risk which was calculated using a statistical method for determining the relative risk of having initially presented with AVM haemorrhage, termed Risk(exp).
RESULTS: The Risk(model) calculated by both haemodynamic- and structural-weighted estimates correlated with experimental risks with chi2 = 6.0 and 0.64, respectively. The risks of the structural-weighted estimate were more correlated to experimental risks.
CONCLUSIONS: Using two different approaches to the calculation of AVM haemorrhage risk, we found a general agreement with independent statistical estimates of haemorrhagic risk based on patient data. Computational approaches are feasible; future work can focus on specific pathomechanistic questions. Detailed patient-specific computational models can also be developed as an adjunct to individual patient risk assessment for risk-stratification purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9832025     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00059-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  5 in total

1.  Can induction of systemic hypotension help prevent nidus rupture complicating arteriovenous malformation embolization?: analysis of underlying mechanism achieved using a theoretical model.

Authors:  T F Massoud; G J Hademenos; W L Young; E Gao; J Pile-Spellman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Theoretical models for regulation of blood flow.

Authors:  Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Computer simulation of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation-validation analysis of hemodynamics parameters.

Authors:  Y Kiran Kumar; Shashi Bhushan Mehta; Manjunath Ramachandra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Computational Network Modeling of Intranidal Hemodynamic Compartmentalization in a Theoretical Three-Dimensional Brain Arteriovenous Malformation.

Authors:  Mika S Jain; Huy M Do; Tarik F Massoud
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  A Computational Framework for Pre-Interventional Planning of Peripheral Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Gaia Franzetti; Mirko Bonfanti; Cyrus Tanade; Chung Sim Lim; Janice Tsui; George Hamilton; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini; Stavroula Balabani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.305

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.