Literature DB >> 9831966

Clinical importance of non-genetic and genetic cytochrome P450 function tests in liver disease.

E Tanaka1.   

Abstract

Liver disease is associated with reduced metabolic capacity for drugs that are metabolized by oxidative biotransformation. Three cytochrome P450 (P450 or CYP) gene families in liver microsomes (CYP 1, CYP2 and CYP3) appear to be responsible for much of the drug metabolism that takes place. The genetic polymorphism of the CYPs responsible for debrisoquine/ sparteine (CYP2D6) metabolism and S-mephenytoin (CYP2C19) metabolism has been well documented, but information on the impairment of each isoform in liver disease is still limited. There are two types of hepatic P450 function tests. One type consists of non-genetic P450 function tests (CYP1A2, 2A6, 2C9/10, 2E1 and 3A3/4), and probe drugs include caffeine, catalysed by CYP1A2, coumarin by CYP2A6, phenytoin by CYP2C6, chlorzoxazone by CYP2E1, and nifedipine, erythromycin and lidocaine by CYP3A3/4. The second type of genetic P450 function tests (CYP2C19 and CYP2D6) involves probe drugs such as S-mephenytoin, catalysed by CYP2C19, and debrisoquine and sparteine, catalysed by CYP2D6. The metabolism of the probe drugs used in non-genetic P450 function tests in patients with liver disease falls into two categories: reduced (CYP1A2, CYP2C, 2E1 and 3A) and unchanged (CYP2C). In genetic P450 function tests there seems to be a lesser degree of inhibition in poor metabolizers (PMs) than extensive metabolizers (EMs) among patients with liver disease. There have been very few reports on changes in metabolism of the probe drugs used in genetic P450 function tests in liver disease. In this paper the subject is reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9831966     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00135.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  8 in total

1.  Modification of CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 activities in haemoglobin E-beta thalassemia patients.

Authors:  Nuntiya Somparn; Upa Kukongviriyapan; Wichittra Tassaneeyakul; Arunee Jetsrisuparb; Veerapol Kukongviriyapan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Drug development and use in the elderly: search for the right dose and dosing regimen (Parts I and II).

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Cytochrome P450 3A: ontogeny and drug disposition.

Authors:  S N de Wildt; G L Kearns; J S Leeder; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics. An update.

Authors:  V Rodighiero
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy of nanodisc-embedded human CYP3A4.

Authors:  Aleksandra Z Kijac; Ying Li; Stephen G Sligar; Chad M Rienstra
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Knock-in mouse lines expressing either mitochondrial or microsomal CYP1A1: differing responses to dietary benzo[a]pyrene as proof of principle.

Authors:  Hongbin Dong; Timothy P Dalton; Marian L Miller; Ying Chen; Shigeyuki Uno; Zhanquan Shi; Howard G Shertzer; Seema Bansal; Narayan G Avadhani; Daniel W Nebert
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mellar Davis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug-induced torsade de pointes: potential tool for improving clinical drug development and prescribing.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.