Literature DB >> 9830074

Efficacy of an alcohol-free chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an antimicrobial agent.

K R Eldridge1, S F Finnie, J A Stephens, A M Mauad, C A Munoz, J D Kettering.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Antimicrobial mouthrinses have become an important part of comprehensive dental care. However, mouthrinses that contain alcohol have been shown to be detrimental to patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, to some immunocompromised patients, to families with small children, and to persons sensitive to alcohol.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of alcohol-free, 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse in reducing microbial levels when compared with commercially available 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and essential oils mouthrinses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consisted of both in vitro and in vivo investigations. The double-blind study included 32 subjects randomly assigned to 3 groups, equalized according to the indices tested. One group (n = 11) received essential oils rinse; the second group (n = 11) received CHX; and the last group (n = 10) received the alcohol-free CHX. Subjects were asked not to use any mechanical means of oral hygiene for 21 days. The in vitro part of the study consisted of Streptococcus mutans strip tests.
RESULTS: Mean plaque scores for both CHX products decreased after 21 days, whereas the mean for the essential oils increased. Bleeding and gingival index scores for all 3 groups increased, which may be due to the initially healthy tissues of the participants. Relative microbial growth for S mutans for both the CHX products decreased to 0 after 21 days, whereas the counts for the essential oils group remained varied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9830074     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70056-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

1.  Potential hazards due to food additives in oral hygiene products.

Authors:  Damla Tuncer Budanur; Murat Cengizhan Yas; Elif Sepet
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 2.  Adverse events associated with home use of mouthrinses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Chiarella Sforza; Conchita Martín
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09-23

3.  Anti-Inflammatory and Protective Effects of Juncus effusus L. Water Extract on Oral Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Akihiro Wada; Keiji Murakami; Yumi Ishikawa; Takashi Amoh; Kouji Hirao; Yuki Hosokawa; Daisuke Hinode; Yoichiro Miyake; Hiromichi Yumoto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Chlorhexidine alcohol base mouthrinse versus Chlorhexidine formaldehyde base mouthrinse efficacy on plaque control: double blind, randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Oumkeltoum Ennibi; Leila Lakhdar; Amal Bouziane; Yahia Bensouda; Redouane Abouqal
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01

5.  Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity.

Authors:  Dirk W Lachenmeier
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Silver nanoparticles as active ingredient used for alcohol-free mouthwash.

Authors:  Marzieh Fattahi Dolat Abadi; Sedigheh Mehrabian; Babak Asghari; Amirmorteza Ebrahimzadeh Namvar; Fatemeh Ezzatifar; Abdolaziz Rastegar Lari
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2013-04-29

7.  Does human saliva decrease the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine against oral bacteria?

Authors:  Thaer Abouassi; Christian Hannig; Katja Mahncke; Lamprini Karygianni; Martin Wolkewitz; Elmar Hellwig; Ali Al-Ahmad
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.