Literature DB >> 9829765

Doing research in general practice: advice for the uninitiated.

M Pierce1.   

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of the importance of primary care research in relation to diabetes. Doing research in general practice is in many ways different from the hospital setting. This article considers some of the potential barriers to doing valid and reliable research in general practice. It is written for both novice researchers and researchers new to the general practice setting. Careful initial definition of the research question is crucial, especially as the clinical material may be less well defined in general practice and patients' problems need addressing on many levels (physical, psychological, social, cultural). Searching the literature for general practice-based studies is not straightforward. If your study involves more than one geographical site you may have to obtain ethical approval from multiple research ethical committees, and it is prudent to discuss your research with the Local Medical Committee. Practical advice is given on working with practices: improving response rates from questionnaires; recruiting and retaining practices; 'getting hold' of the GPs; particular difficulties related to novice or experienced practices; ensuring uniformity of methodology; and the importance of ancillary staff. Contentious issues such as money should be discussed at the outset. Many areas of the country now have General Practice Research Networks, and many of these now have NHS R&D support funding. Training in research methodology can be accessed through the Association of University Departments of General Practice or Royal College of General Practitioners or local departments of general practice. A list of useful contacts is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9829765     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(1998110)15:3+<s25::aid-dia726>3.3.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  2 in total

1.  A service-academic partnership in primary care research: one practice's experience.

Authors:  Anthony J S White; Jan Date; Jane Taylor; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Recruitment for a provincial asthma study. Participation of network and non-network primary care physicians.

Authors:  Don D Sin; S F Paul Man; Robert L Cowie; Heather M Sharpe; Elaine M Andrews; Neil R Bell; Carolyn I Nilsson; Sheldon Spier; Lawrence W Svenson; Luxie C Trachsel; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.