Literature DB >> 9829424

Cost-effectiveness of new treatments for overactive bladder: the example of tolterodine, a new muscarinic agent: a Markov model.

G Kobelt1, L Jönsson, A Mattiasson.   

Abstract

Economic analyses of interventions for chronic diseases require evaluations over a long timeframe to illustrate the benefits and costs of treatments. Clinical trials are generally short and carried out in strictly controlled conditions. They are therefore of limited value for economic evaluation aimed at facilitating decisions about resource allocation. The objective of this study was to develop a simulation model that allows integration of data from different sources to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of new treatments for overactive bladder. The model compares tolterodine, a new treatment that aims at alleviating symptoms and improving patients' quality of life, to no treatment. Simulations for Sweden are presented as an example. The Markov model combines clinical, observational, and economic data. Markov states are defined based on severity of symptoms of overactive bladder (frequency of voids and leaks). Specific costs for drug treatment and use of sanitary protections as well as utilities are assigned for each state. The effectiveness of tolterodine is based on controlled clinical trials and open long-term extensions of these trials. Outcome is measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and as the number of months spent in a state with no or very limited symptoms. During the course of 1 year, patients treated with tolterodine spend more time in states with no or limited symptoms compared to those receiving no treatment. Tolterodine-treated patients having a better quality of life during the year. The mean utility of the treated cohort is 0.70, compared to 0.67 in the no-treatment cohort, which is equivalent to the entire cohort moving by one level to a state with less severe symptoms. Mean total costs per patient in the tolterodine arm are SEK8,595 (US $1,131; 1 US$ = 7.6 SEK) compared to SEK3,286 (US$432) in the no-treatment arm. The extra cost due to tolterodine is SEK380 (US$50) per month, which falls within the range of monthly amounts that patients were willing to pay out of pocket for a 25 or 50% improvement of their symptoms in a previous study. The cost for pads is reduced by 23%. The marginal cost per QALY gained with tolterodine is estimated at SEK213,000 (US$28,000). Based on this simulation model, it appears that treatment of overactive bladder with a well-tolerated pharmacological treatment such as tolterodine is cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9829424     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:6<599::aid-nau4>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  16 in total

Review 1.  Accounting for noncompliance in pharmacoeconomic evaluations.

Authors:  D A Hughes; A Bagust; A Haycox; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of fesoterodine and tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder with urge urinary incontinence in Spain and Finland.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Antti Valpas; Javier Rejas; Kari Linden; Marion Kvasz; Sonya J Snedecor
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Cost effectiveness of long-term treatment with eszopiclone for primary insomnia in adults: a decision analytical model.

Authors:  Marc F Botteman; Ron J Ozminkowski; Shaohung Wang; Chris L Pashos; Kendyl Schaefer; Daniel J Foley
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for the management of urge incontinence.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes; Dominique Dubois
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of overactive bladder : a systematic and critical review of published economic evaluations.

Authors:  Denis Getsios; Wissam El-Hadi; Ingrid Caro; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A retrospective claims analysis of the direct costs of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Kraig S Kinchen; Stacey Long; Lucinda Orsini; William Crown; Ralph Swindle
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-11-25

7.  The cost utility of solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Authors:  Leona Hakkaart; Paul Verboom; Richard Phillips; Maiwenn J Al
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Cost Effectiveness of Controlled-Release Oxybutynin Compared with Immediate-Release Oxybutynin and Tolterodine in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK, France and Austria.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Dele Abegunde; Francis J Ruiz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Oxybutynin extended release and tolterodine immediate release : a health economic comparison.

Authors:  D Getsios; J J Caro; K J Ishak; W El-Hadi; K Payne; M O'connel; D Albrecht; W Feng; D Dubois
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Cost-effectiveness of eszopiclone for the treatment of adults with primary chronic insomnia.

Authors:  Sonya J Snedecor; Marc F Botteman; Chris Bojke; Kendyl Schaefer; Nadine Barry; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.