Literature DB >> 9829243

A calculation of the relative biological effectiveness of 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources using the concept of proximity function.

C S Wuu1, M Zaider.   

Abstract

The clinical application of encapsulated radioactive sources in brachytherapy plays an important role in the treatment of malignancy. 125I and 103Pd sources have been widely used in the permanent implant of prostate cancer. An important consideration for the choice of brachytherapy sources is their relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Previous calculations of this quantity have used the dose-averaged lineal energy, yD, as a measure of biological effectiveness. In this approach, however, the selection of a relevant site size remains an open question. Here we avoid this problem by using the generalized theory of dual radiation action to calculate the initial slope, alpha, of the dose-effect curves using the proximity function, t(x), and the biological response function, gamma(x). At low doses and/or low dose rates (e.g., prostate implants) the parameter alpha determines the RBE. Proximity function, t(x), is the probability distribution function of distances between pairs of sublesions; and the biological function, gamma(x), is the probability that two sublesions at a distance x apart results in a lesion. Functions t(x) have been calculated for each source using the Monte Carlo transport codes PHOEL and PROTON5. The function gamma(x) has been taken from a published analysis. The RBE values thus obtained are: 1.5 for 125I and 1.6 for 103Pd. The question of whether an "effective" site size exists where yD approximates best the variation of alpha with radiation quality is also addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9829243     DOI: 10.1118/1.598415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Investigating the dosimetric and tumor control consequences of prostate seed loss and migration.

Authors:  Courtney Knaup; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Carlos Esquivel; Sotirios Stathakis; Gregory Swanson; Dimos Baltas; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Average stopping powers for electron and photon sources for radiobiological modeling and microdosimetric applications.

Authors:  Oleg N Vassiliev; Stephen F Kry; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Courtney Knaup; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Carlos Esquivel; Dimos Baltas; Sotirios Stathakis; Gregory Swanson; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-07-06

4.  Evaluation of the effect of prostate volume change on tumor control probability in LDR brachytherapy.

Authors:  Courtney Knaup; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Sotirios Stathakis; Mark Smith; Gregory Swanson; Niko Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.