Literature DB >> 9829192

Template preparation for PCR and RFLP of amplification products for the detection and identification of Cyclospora sp. and Eimeria spp. Oocysts directly from raspberries.

K C Jinneman1, J H Wetherington, W E Hill, A M Adams, J M Johnson, B J Tenge, N L Dang, R L Manger, M M Wekell.   

Abstract

Raspberries were epidemiologically associated with cyclosporiasis outbreaks during 1996 and 1997. The 18S rRNA genes of Cyclospora cayetanensis and several species of a closely related genus, Eimeria, were sequenced and primers for a nested PCR developed in a previous study. The ability to distinguish amplified products of Cyclospora sp. from those of Eimeria spp. is important for testing food and environmental samples. Therefore, an RFLP analysis of amplified products was used to differentiate Cyclospora cayetanensis from Eimeria spp. PCR inhibitors and the low levels of Cyclospora oocysts present in raspberries make template preparation for PCR challenging. Several approaches for PCR template preparation from raspberry samples were evaluated. Template preparation methods using various washing and concentration steps, oocyst disruption protocols, resin matrix treatment, DNA precipitation, and/or the addition of nonfat dried milk solution to a PCR using modified primers were evaluated first with oocysts of Eimeria tenella then refined with oocysts of C. cayetanensis. Approximately 10 E. tenella oocysts per PCR or approximately 19 C. cayetanensis oocysts per PCR were detected with the optimized template preparation method. The addition of 20 microliters of raspberry wash sediment extract and nonfat dried milk solution did not inhibit the amplification of DNA from as few as 10 E. tenella and 25 C. cayetanensis oocysts in a 100-microliter PCR. The nucleotide sequences of C. cayetanensis and the Eimeria spp. are 94 to 96% similar in the amplified region, but the amplification products from the two genera were distinguished using an RFLP analysis with the restriction enzyme MnlI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9829192     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.11.1497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  13 in total

1.  Extraction-free, filter-based template preparation for rapid and sensitive PCR detection of pathogenic parasitic protozoa.

Authors:  P A Orlandi; K A Lampel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections.

Authors:  Jaco J Verweij; C Rune Stensvold
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Cyclospore cayetanensis in Anhui, China.

Authors:  Ke-Xia Wang; Chao-Pin Li; Jian Wang; Ye Tian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  An optimized DNA extraction method for molecular identification of coccidian species.

Authors:  Xiaoli Tang; Guangping Huang; Xianyong Liu; Saeed El-Ashram; Geru Tao; Chunxia Lu; Jingxia Suo; Xun Suo
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Highly sensitive and specific PCR assay for reliable detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts.

Authors:  Laura F Lalonde; Alvin A Gajadhar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Update on Cyclospora cayetanensis, a food-borne and waterborne parasite.

Authors:  Ynés R Ortega; Roxana Sanchez
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in environmental waters without microscopic confirmation.

Authors:  Joan M Shields; Betty H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Targeting single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the 18S rRNA gene to differentiate Cyclospora species from Eimeria species by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Palmer A Orlandi; Laurenda Carter; Anna Marie Brinker; Alexandre J da Silva; Dan-My Chu; Keith A Lampel; Steven R Monday
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Sensitive and specific identification by polymerase chain reaction of Eimeria tenella and Eimeria maxima, important protozoan pathogens in laboratory avian facilities.

Authors:  Hyun-A Lee; Sunhwa Hong; Yungho Chung; Okjin Kim
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  Molecular characterization of eimeria species naturally infecting egyptian baldi chickens.

Authors:  Sahar M Gadelhaq; Waleed M Arafa; Shawky M Aboelhadid
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.