Literature DB >> 9828582

Cost effectiveness of low-molecular weight heparin versus warfarin following hip replacement surgery.

M E Saunders1, R E Grant.   

Abstract

Little information is available on the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus warfarin for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following hip replacement surgery. Still less is known of the comparative cost effectiveness of these two therapies. A retrospective study was done on 56 patients who underwent elective hip surgery at an urban medical center between 1991 and 1996. All patients received enoxaparin or warfarin for purposes of thromboprophylaxis. An analysis of medication cost, therapy, laboratory monitoring, and bleeding events of the two antithrombolytic agents was undertaken. Total savings with enoxaparin averaged $1253 per patient, or $137,886 over the study period. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was 0% with enoxaparin and 3% with warfarin. These data indicate that enoxaparin is a more cost-effective and efficacious regimen for thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement surgery than warfarin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9828582      PMCID: PMC2608386     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  7 in total

Review 1.  Low molecular weight heparin.

Authors:  J Hirsh; M N Levine
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  R D Hull; G E Raskob; G F Pineo; D Green; A A Trowbridge; C G Elliott; R G Lerner; J Hall; T Sparling; H R Brettell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A randomized controlled trial of a low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) to prevent deep-vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery.

Authors:  A G Turpie; M N Levine; J Hirsh; C J Carter; R M Jay; P J Powers; M Andrew; R D Hull; M Gent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; F R Rosendaal; H R Büller; E Dekker; D W Hommes; J P Vandenbroucke; E Briët
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Efficacy and cost of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with standard heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D R Anderson; B J O'Brien; M N Levine; R Roberts; P S Wells; J Hirsh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Cost/benefit aspects on thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  D Bergqvist; T Mätzsch
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1993-03

Review 7.  Therapeutic use of low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  R D Hull; G F Pineo
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1993-03
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of extended prophylaxis with fondaparinux compared with low molecular weight heparin against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Jonas Lundkvist; David Bergqvist; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-01-16

2.  Enoxaparin: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David Bergqvist
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Measuring the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic consequences of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Susan R Kahn; Bruce L Davidson; Lars Borris; Patrick Bossuyt; Gary Raskob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.