Literature DB >> 9828336

Relationships between dioxins in soil, air, ash, and emissions from a municipal solid waste incinerator emitting large amounts of dioxins.

M Lorber1, P Pinsky, P Gehring, C Braverman, D Winters, W Sovocool.   

Abstract

The Columbus Municipal Waste-to-Energy (Columbus WTE) facility in Columbus, Ohio, began operation in June, 1983 and ceased operation in December, 1994. During its operation, it was estimated to have released nearly 1,000 grams of dioxin Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) per year. This compares to a 1994 estimate of 9,300 g TEQ/yr from all sources emitting dioxins into the air in the United States (EPA, 1994), and to total releases of dioxins near or below 1,000 grams TEQ/Yr for England (Eduljee and Keyke, 1996), Belgium (Wevers and De Fre, 1995), and West Germany (Fiedler and Hutzinger, 1992). Because of the magnitude of emissions from this single source, studies were undertaken to evaluate the impacts to air and soil near the incinerator. This paper presents analyses evaluating dioxin concentrations and profiles in four media: stack gas, ambient air within 3 km of the incinerator, soil samples up to 8 km from the incinerator, and incinerator ash. Principal findings include: 1) an "incinerator signature" profile, as defined by stack gas emissions, was found in the ash and in subsets of the air and soil matrices, 2) soil concentrations declined from directly outside the incinerator property to the city at large, 3) an urban background soil concentration of dioxin Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) was estimated at 4 pg/g, while concentrations generally within 2 km of the incinerator ranged from 4-60 pg TEQ/g, 4) an urban background air concentration was estimated at 0.05 pg TEQ/m3, while air concentrations at a specific location about 2 km in the downwind direction of the incinerator had concentrations of 0.17 and 0.35 pg TEQ/m3 during two sampling dates, 5) analysis of the soil monitoring data in combination with the stack test data suggests that less than 2% of emitted dioxins can be found in the soil near the incinerator, and 6) principal component analysis suggests that the fraction of total concentration of OCDD is the single feature explaining most of the variation of all concentration profiles. This paper discusses these and other findings, and their implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9828336     DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(98)00279-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of industrial emissions and carpet dust concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in a multi-center U.S. study.

Authors:  Nicole C Deziel; John R Nuckols; Rena R Jones; Barry I Graubard; Anneclaire J De Roos; Anjoeka Pronk; Chris Gourley; Joanne S Colt; Mary H Ward
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Spatial distribution of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in soil around a municipal solid waste incinerator.

Authors:  Wenbin Liu; Haifeng Li; Zhenyu Tian; Huiting Xie; Changliang Li
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Emissions of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  Trang VoPham; Kimberly A Bertrand; Jared A Fisher; Mary H Ward; Francine Laden; Rena R Jones
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 4.  Dioxins and organohalogen contaminants in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Shinsuke Tanabe; Tu Binh Minh
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Assessment of dioxin-like soil contamination in Mexico by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  E García-Nieto; M Nichkova; L Yáñez; R Costilla-Salazar; A Torres-Dosal; S J Gee; B D Hammock; L Juárez-Santacruz; F Díaz-Barriga
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Determinants of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in house dust samples from four areas of the United States.

Authors:  N C Deziel; J R Nuckols; J S Colt; A J De Roos; A Pronk; C Gourley; R K Severson; W Cozen; J R Cerhan; P Hartge; M H Ward
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Residential proximity to industrial combustion facilities and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case-control study.

Authors:  Anjoeka Pronk; John R Nuckols; Anneclaire J De Roos; Matthew Airola; Joanne S Colt; James R Cerhan; Lindsay Morton; Wendy Cozen; Richard Severson; Aaron Blair; David Cleverly; Mary H Ward
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Environmental impact assessment of Gonabad municipal waste landfill site using Leopold Matrix.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Sajjadi; Zohreh Aliakbari; Mohammad Matlabi; Hamed Biglari; Seyedeh Samira Rasouli
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-02-25

9.  Verifying locations of sources of historical environmental releases of dioxin-like compounds in the U.S.: implications for exposure assessment and epidemiologic inference.

Authors:  Rena R Jones; Trang VoPham; Boitumelo Sevilla; Matthew Airola; Abigail Flory; Nicole C Deziel; John R Nuckols; Anjoeka Pronk; Francine Laden; Mary H Ward
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.563

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.