Literature DB >> 9827864

Maintained ocular torsion produced by bilateral and unilateral galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation in humans.

S R Watson1, A E Brizuela, I S Curthoys, J G Colebatch, H G MacDougall, G M Halmagyi.   

Abstract

This study was designed to measure ocular movements evoked by galvanic (DC) stimulation using computerised video-oculography. Long duration (>30 s) galvanic vestibular stimulation at currents of up to 5 mA through large-area surface electrodes over the mastoid processes causes maintained changes in the ocular torsional position of both eyes in healthy human subjects. With the subject seated and the head held firmly, torsion was measured by a computer-based image-processing system (VTM). Torsion was recorded in darkness, with or without a single fixation point. With bilateral stimulation, the upper poles of both eyes always torted away from the side of cathode placement and toward the anode. For unilateral stimulation, torsion was directed away from the cathode or toward the anode. The magnitude of ocular torsion was dependent on current strength: with bilateral stimulation the peak torsion was on average 2.88 degrees for 5-mA current intensity compared with 1.58 degrees for 3 mA. A smaller amplitude of torsion was obtained for unilateral stimulation. The average peak torsion was the same for both eyes for all forms of stimulation. Our findings indicate that low-intensity galvanic stimulation evokes ocular torsion in normal subjects, an effect which is consistent with an action on otolith afferents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9827864     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Anodal vestibular stimulation does not suppress vestibular reflexes in human subjects.

Authors:  Ann M Bacsi; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human posture and perception while standing.

Authors:  Daniel L Wardman; Janet L Taylor; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Static and dynamic changes in body orientation modulate spinal reflex excitability in humans.

Authors:  Maria Knikou; William Zev Rymer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vestibular contribution to combined arm and trunk motion.

Authors:  Franck Mars; Philippe S Archambault; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Christopher J Dakin; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Modeling postural instability with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Hamish G MacDougall; Steven T Moore; Ian S Curthoys; F Owen Black
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Vestibular influences on postural instability induced by movements of the visual environment and support.

Authors:  I V Orlov; Yu K Stolbkov; V S Shuplyakov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03

9.  Artificial vestibular feedback in conditions of a modified body scheme.

Authors:  Yu K Stolbkov; I V Orlov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-13

10.  A short latency vestibulomasseteric reflex evoked by electrical stimulation over the mastoid in healthy humans.

Authors:  Franca Deriu; Eusebio Tolu; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.