Literature DB >> 9827774

Cortical areas with enhanced activation during object-centred spatial information processing. A PET study.

M Honda1, S P Wise, R A Weeks, M P Deiber, M Hallett.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of object-centred unilateral neglect suggests that some neural networks process spatial information relative to reference objects. To examine object-centred information processing, we measured regional cerebral blood flow in 11 normal subjects with PET. During each PET scan, a subject viewed a sample stimulus followed by a cue on a video screen. The sample consisted of two polygons, termed 'objects', each located in a corner of the screen. A small target spot appeared in a corner of each polygon. There were two tasks: the visuomotor task and the matching-to-sample task. In the visuomotor task, the subject moved a joystick in a direction indicated by either the location of the target spot inside the object (if object-centred coordinates were operative) or the location of the object relative to the video screen (if screen-centred coordinates were operative). In the matching-to-sample task, the subject moved the joystick to report whether the relevant spatial information (object- or screen-centred) in the cue matched the sample. In both the visuomotor and the matching-to-sample task, use of object-centred (versus screen- or viewer-centred) information caused augmented activation in the inferior occipitotemporal cortex, bilaterally, in the left superior occipital gyrus, and in both the thalamus and the brainstem. In addition, in the visuomotor task such activation occurred in the right posterior parietal cortex and in the left ventral premotor, dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior supplementary motor areas. These findings suggest the involvement of the occipitotemporal cortex and a broad frontoparietal network when, as in the visuomotor task, object-centred information guides movement. When the same data underlie declarative reports, as in the matching-to-sample task, the occipitotemporal cortex remains engaged but the frontoparietal network diminishes in importance.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9827774     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.11.2145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  11 in total

1.  Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; T Paus; P K Sipila
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Cortical mechanisms for trans-saccadic memory and integration of multiple object features.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Emotion modulates allocentric but not egocentric stimulus localization: implications for dual visual systems perspectives.

Authors:  James H Kryklywy; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in static and dynamic conditions in humans.

Authors:  S Moraresku; K Vlcek
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.881

6.  Severity of hypoperfusion in distinct brain regions predicts severity of hemispatial neglect in different reference frames.

Authors:  Peyman Shirani; Julia Thorn; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Melissa Newhart; Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Object-centred pseudoneglect for non-verbal visual stimuli.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pia; Marco Neppi-Modona; Alessia Folegatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning networks in health and Parkinson's disease: reproducibility and treatment effects.

Authors:  Maren Carbon; Maria Felice Ghilardi; Andrew Feigin; Masafumi Fukuda; Giulia Silvestri; Marc J Mentis; Claude Ghez; James R Moeller; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Vijay Kannan; Mikolaj A Pawlak; Jonathan T Kleinman; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer E Heidler-Gary; Edward H Herskovits; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Neural substrates of visual spatial coding and visual feedback control for hand movements in allocentric and target-directed tasks.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.