Literature DB >> 9827575

Thermodynamics of full agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist binding to wild-type and mutant adenosine A1 receptors.

A Dalpiaz1, A Townsend-Nicholson, M W Beukers, P R Schofield, A P IJzerman.   

Abstract

A thermodynamic analysis of the binding of a full agonist (N6-cyclopentyladenosine), a partial agonist (8-butylamino-N6-cyclopentyladenosine) and an antagonist (8-cyclopentyltheophylline) to human wild-type and mutant (mutation of a threonine (Thr) to an alanine (Ala) residue at position 277) adenosine A1 receptors expressed on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and to rat brain adenosine A1 receptors was undertaken. The thermodynamic parameters deltaGo (standard free energy), deltaHo (standard enthalpy) and deltaSo (standard entropy) of the binding equilibrium to rat brain receptors were determined by means of affinity measurements carried out at four different temperatures (0, 10, 20 and 25 degrees) and van't Hoff plots. Two temperatures (0 and 25 degrees) were considered for human receptors. Affinity constants were obtained from inhibition assays on membrane preparations of rat brain and CHO cells by use of the antagonist [3H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) as selective adenosine A1 receptor radioligand. As for rat brain receptors, full agonist binding was totally entropy driven, whereas antagonist binding was essentially enthalpy driven. Partial agonist binding appeared both enthalpy and entropy driven. As for human receptors, full agonist affinity was highly dependent on the presence of Thr277. Moreover, affinity to both wild-type and mutant receptors was enhanced by temperature increase, suggesting a totally entropy-driven binding. Antagonist binding did not depend on the presence of Thr277. Antagonist affinity decreased with an increase in temperature, suggesting a mainly enthalpy-driven binding. Partial agonist binding was significantly dependent on the presence of Thr277 at 25 degrees, whereas such a dependence was not evident at 0 degrees. It is concluded that Thr277 contributes only to the binding of adenosine derivatives and that its role changes drastically with the receptor conformation and with the type of agonist (full or partial) interacting with the adenosine A1 receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9827575     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00202-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  8 in total

1.  The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Synthesis and study of 5'-ester prodrugs of N6-cyclopentyladenosine, a selective A1 receptor agonist.

Authors:  A Dalpiaz; A Scatturin; E Menegatti; F Bortolotti; B Pavan; C Biondi; E Durini; S Manfredini
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Allosteric modulation, thermodynamics and binding to wild-type and mutant (T277A) adenosine A1 receptors of LUF5831, a novel nonadenosine-like agonist.

Authors:  Laura H Heitman; Thea Mulder-Krieger; Ronald F Spanjersberg; Jacobien K von Frijtag Drabbe Künzel; Alessandro Dalpiaz; Adriaan P IJzerman
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors.

Authors:  B B Fredholm; A P IJzerman; K A Jacobson; K N Klotz; J Linden
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 18.923

5.  A Non-imaging High Throughput Approach to Chemical Library Screening at the Unmodified Adenosine-A3 Receptor in Living Cells.

Authors:  Maria Augusta Arruda; Leigh A Stoddart; Karolina Gherbi; Stephen J Briddon; Barrie Kellam; Stephen J Hill
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  An Ensemble-Based Protocol for the Computational Prediction of Helix-Helix Interactions in G Protein-Coupled Receptors using Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Nojood A Altwaijry; Michael Baron; David W Wright; Peter V Coveney; Andrea Townsend-Nicholson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Structure-Based Design of Potent and Selective Ligands at the Four Adenosine Receptors.

Authors:  Willem Jespers; Ana Oliveira; Rubén Prieto-Díaz; María Majellaro; Johan Åqvist; Eddy Sotelo; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Deciphering the Agonist Binding Mechanism to the Adenosine A1 Receptor.

Authors:  Giuseppe Deganutti; Kerry Barkan; Barbara Preti; Michele Leuenberger; Mark Wall; Bruno G Frenguelli; Martin Lochner; Graham Ladds; Christopher A Reynolds
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-01-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.