Literature DB >> 9826003

Factors influencing the quality of food extracts for in vitro and in vivo diagnosis.

S Vieths1, A Hoffmann, T Holzhauser, U Müller, J Reindl, D Haustein.   

Abstract

Food extracts for diagnostic purposes often lack sufficient activity and consistency. Biologically standardized food extracts are not available on the market. Using extracts from plant-derived foods as examples, we investigated factors which may be important for the quality of such extracts. Divergent allergenic activities were found between strains of apples, but not within varieties of celery tuber (celeriac), hazelnut, and peanut, respectively. Heating of the food remarkably reduced the activity of apple, hazelnut, and celeriac, but had little effect on peanut. By contrast, heating of semipurified protein extracts from celery tuber and apple for 30 min at 100 degrees C did not deplete the immunoreactivity of the major allergens, indicating that this is an inappropriate test for identifying labile food allergens. Due to their high endogenous enzyme activities, apples and other fruits require special extraction procedures applying either low temperature or enzyme inhibitors. Variation of extraction conditions had little effect on the composition and activity of extracts from hazelnut. The storage stability of skin test solutions from plant foods can be improved by avoiding phenol as an additive and by including 50% of glycerol. For model studies considering neoallergens, IgE was raised in mice against native and heated celery tuber, respectively. When extracts from nonthermally and thermally processed celeriac were subjected to an RBL-cell mediator release assay with these sera, an inverse ranking was obtained with anti-heated celeriac IgE and anti-native celeriac IgE, respectively. These data indicated that new epitopes had been formed by the heating process. Since all parameters were tested in model experiments with either human or murine IgE, their relevance has to be proven in further clinical investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9826003     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb04965.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  4 in total

1.  Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato.

Authors:  Dietmar Schwarz; Saskia Welter; Eckhard George; Philipp Franken; Karola Lehmann; Wolfram Weckwerth; Sabine Dölle; Margitta Worm
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Natural Variation of Hazelnut Allergenicity: Is There Any Potential for Selecting Hypoallergenic Varieties?

Authors:  Miguel Ribeiro; Joana Costa; Isabel Mafra; Sandra Cabo; Ana Paula Silva; Berta Gonçalves; Mélanie Hillion; Michel Hébraud; Gilberto Igrejas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Effect of tomato variety, cultivation, climate and processing on Sola l 4, an allergen from Solanum lycopersicum.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kurze; Roberto Lo Scalzo; Gabriele Campanelli; Wilfried Schwab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of the Strawberry Genotype, Cultivation and Processing on the Fra a 1 Allergen Content.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kurze; Vanessa Kock; Roberto Lo Scalzo; Klaus Olbricht; Wilfried Schwab
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.