Literature DB >> 9825554

A comparative assessment of acceptance of different types of functional appliances.

H G Sergl1, A Zentner.   

Abstract

Patients' acceptance of an orthodontic appliance may influence compliance and thus contribute to a successful outcome of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of shape and design of different types of functional appliances on their acceptance by patients. For each of 10 adult volunteer subjects employed in the study eight different functional appliances were fabricated which had a varying extension of the resin base and amount of interocclusal opening. Effects of appliances on speech, initial acceptance, and acceptance after wearing were assessed by means of standardized tests. Amongst the appliances tested the bionator, functional corrector FR-I and elastic open activator showed the highest acceptance by the test subjects. The results of the study indicate that there is a considerable difference in acceptance of various types of functional appliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825554     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.5.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  8 in total

1.  Patients' and Parents' Perception of Functional Appliances: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Yağmur Lena; Aylin Paşaoğlu Bozkurt; Enver Yetkiner
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Evaluation of the effect of upper complete denture on gustatory and olfactory senses.

Authors:  Tahereh Ghaffari; Fahimeh Hamedi Rad; Sepideh Mosadeg Kahnamoee
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2009-12-15

3.  The Hybrid Aesthetic Functional (HAF) Appliance: A Less Visible Proposal for Functional Orthodontics.

Authors:  Christos Livas
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-07-17

4.  Efficacy of a Mandibular Advancement Appliance on Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children: A Study Protocol of a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ghassan Idris; Barbara Galland; Christopher J Robertson; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  The impact of general self-efficacy and the severity of malocclusion on acceptance of removable orthodontic appliances in 10- to 12-year-old patients.

Authors:  Navid Naseri; Tahereh Baherimoghadam; Niloofar Bassagh; Shahram Hamedani; Elmira Bassagh; Zahra Hashemi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, Functional Impairments and Satisfaction With the Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) When Leveling and Aligning Crowded Teeth: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hallaj I Alsino; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Issam Alkhouri; Rashad M T Murad; Tarek Z Khattab
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-26

7.  The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marek Nahajowski; Joanna Lis; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  The Use and Preference of Functional Appliances among a Sample of Iraqi Orthodontists: A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Hiba M Hussien; Zena Hekmat Altaee; Mohammed Nahidh; Sajid Chaffat Auliawi Al-Mayahi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-10-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.