Literature DB >> 9825553

A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.

H M Illing1, D O Morris, R T Lee.   

Abstract

A prospective clinical study with a random allocation of 47 adolescent patients to three different functional appliance groups was established and compared with an untreated control group over a 9-month period. Treatment was undertaken with either a Bionator, Twin Block, or Bass appliance. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were used to quantify the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes produced by the appliances and compared with those observed in the control group as a result of growth. Both the Bionator and Twin Block appliances demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mandibular length (3.9 +/- 2.7 mm; 3.7 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively) compared with the control group (P < 0.05), with an anterior movement of pogonion and point B. Highly statistically significant increases (P < 0.01) were seen in lower face heights for all the appliance groups compared with the control group. The Twin Block group showed the least forward movement of point A due to a change in the inclination of the maxillary plane. The Bionator and Twin Block groups showed statistically significant reductions in the inclination of the upper incisors to the maxillary plane (P < 0.05). The Bass group showed minimal change in the inclination of the lower labial segment to the mandibular plane. The Bionator group demonstrated the greatest proclination of the lower labial segment (4.0 +/- 3.6 degrees). Clinically important changes were measured in all the appliance groups when compared with the control group. Differences were also identified between the functional appliance groups. The Twin Block appliance and, to a lesser extent, the Bionator appeared the most effective in producing sagittal and vertical changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825553     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.5.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Bengisu Akarsu-Guven; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Non-surgical treatment of an Angle Class III malocclusion in adults.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Jian-Xue Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-09-25

Review 3.  The use of functional appliances in contemporary orthodontic practice.

Authors:  A T DiBiase; M T Cobourne; R T Lee
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  The article by Kochel et al. gives rise to certain reservations.

Authors:  Ulrich Fellner
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Analysis of clinical efficacy of interceptive treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in a pair of twins through the use of two modified removable appliances.

Authors:  R Condò; C Perugia; M Bartolino; R Docimo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-13

6.  Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.

Authors:  P Meyer-Marcotty; J Kochel; U Richter; F Richter; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Santosh J Chavan; Wasundhara A Bhad; Umal H Doshi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Use of the Clark Twin Block functional appliance with and without an upper labial bow: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Omar Yaqoob; Andrew T Dibiase; Padhraig S Fleming; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effect of Bionator and Farmand Appliance on the Treatment of Mandibular Deficiency in Prepubertal Stage.

Authors:  Hamidreza Pakshir; Ali Mokhtar; Alireza Darnahal; Zinat Kamali; Mohammad Hadi Behesti; Abdolreza Jamilian
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.