Literature DB >> 9825370

Intravenous propafenone versus intravenous amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation of recent onset: a placebo-controlled study.

G E Kochiadakis1, N E Igoumenidis, E N Simantirakis, M E Marketou, F I Parthenakis, N E Mezilis, P E Vardas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The efficacy and safety of intravenous propafenone, amiodarone, or placebo were compared in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset (duration < or = 48 hours).
METHODS: 143 patients (77 men, mean age 63 +/- 12 years) were studied, of whom 46 received propafenone (2 mg/kg over 15 minutes followed by 10 mg/kg over the next 24 hours), 48 received amiodarone (300 mg intravenously over 1 hour, followed by 20 mg/kg over the next 24 hours, plus 1,800 mg/day orally, in 3 divided doses), and 49 received placebo (the equivalent amount of saline i.v. over 24 hours). Digoxin was administered to all patients who had not previously received it.
RESULTS: Conversion to normal sinus rhythm occurred in 36 of 46 patients (78.2%) receiving propafenone, in 40 of 48 patients (83.3%) receiving amiodarone, and in 27 of the 49 (55.10%) controls (P < 0.02, drug vs placebo, between drugs NS). The mean time to conversion was 2 +/- 3 hours for propafenone, 7 +/- 5 hours for amiodarone, and 13 +/- 9 for placebo (P < 0.05). Patients who converted had smaller atria than those who did not (diameter: 42.7 +/- 5 vs 47.2 +/- 7 mm, P < 0.001 for all). Treatment was discontinued in one patient in the amiodarone group because of an allergic reaction and in two patients in the propafenone group because of excessive QRS widening. No side effects were observed in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both drugs tested intravenously were equally effective and safe for the rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. However, propafenone offered the advantage of more rapid conversion than amiodarone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825370     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anti-Arrhythmic Agents in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Omar F Hassan; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Amar M Salam
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Stavros Apostolakis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-11-27

Review 3.  Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Stavros Apostolakis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-02-15

4.  Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  G Nichol; F McAlister; B Pham; A Laupacis; B Shea; M Green; A Tang; G Wells
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Timothy Watson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-05-02

6.  Torsade de Pointes and Persistent QTc Prolongation after Intravenous Amiodarone.

Authors:  Anna P Kotsia; Georgios Dimitriadis; Giannis G Baltogiannis; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2012-03-05

7.  Dataset for amiodarone adverse events compared to placebo using data from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Morgan K Moroi; Mohammed Ruzieh; Nader M Aboujamous; Mehrdad Ghahramani; Gerald V Naccarelli; John Mandrola; Andrew J Foy
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-11-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.