Literature DB >> 9825350

QT interval and QT dispersion measured with the threshold method depend on threshold level.

V Batchvarov1, G Yi, X Guo, I Savelieva, A J Camm, M Malik.   

Abstract

Various computerized methods with multiple parameter options for measurements of the QT interval now are available. The optimum parameter setting for most algorithms is not known. This study evaluated the influence of the threshold level applied on the T wave differential on the QT interval and its dispersion measured in normal and abnormal electrocardiograms (ECGs). Seven hundred sixty ECGs recorded in 76 normal subjects and 630 in 63 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (10 consecutive recordings in each individual) were analyzed. In each lead of each ECG, the QT interval was measured by the threshold method applied to the first differential of the T wave. The threshold level was varied between 5% and 30% of the T wave maximum in 1% steps, resulting in 26 different choices of QT measurements. With each choice the maximum QTc and the QT dispersion (QTd, standard deviation of the QT in all 12 leads) were obtained for each recording. The maximum QTc was significantly longer in HCM patients than in normal subjects (P < 0.001) at all threshold levels except between 5% and 7%. The QTd was significantly greater in HCM patients at all threshold levels. The QTc and QTd changed significantly with the threshold level. The maximum QTc varied up to 60 ms in normal subjects and up to 70 ms in HCM patients, depending on the threshold level. Thus, the QT interval and its dispersion measured with the threshold method applied to the first T wave differential depended significantly on the threshold level in both normal and diseased hearts. All programmable options of available automatic instruments should be examined carefully before any study, and all algorithmic details should by systematically presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval.

Authors:  M Malik; P Färbom; V Batchvarov; K Hnatkova; A J Camm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Evaluation of drug-induced QT interval prolongation: implications for drug approval and labelling.

Authors:  M Malik; A J Camm
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Light phase-restricted feeding slows basal heart rate to exaggerate the type-3 long QT syndrome phenotype in mice.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schroder; Don E Burgess; Cody L Manning; Yihua Zhao; Arthur J Moss; Abhijit Patwardhan; Claude S Elayi; Karyn A Esser; Brian P Delisle
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Timing of food intake in mice unmasks a role for the cardiomyocyte circadian clock mechanism in limiting QT-interval prolongation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schroder; Don E Burgess; Sidney R Johnson; Makoto Ono; Tanya Seward; Claude S Elayi; Karyn A Esser; Brian P Delisle
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  QT Interval Variability Index and QT Interval Duration in Different Sleep Stages: Analysis of Polysomnographic Recordings in Nonapneic Male Patients.

Authors:  Moonika Viigimae; Deniss Karai; Peeter Pirn; Kristjan Pilt; Kalju Meigas; Jyri Kaik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.