AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the potential and limitations of echocontrast enhancement using Levovist in a non selected consecutive cohort of neurological patients with insufficient native ultrasound investigations. METHODS: In 91 patients an indication for echocontrast application was seen after an insufficient extracranial (n = 17), transtemporal (n = 54), and transforaminal (n = 20) Doppler- und color-coded Duplex sonography. Levovist was injected at a concentration of 400 mg/ml and 200-400 mg/ml for the transcranial and extracranial approach, respectively. The effect of the echocontrast enhancement was assessed semiquantitatively with respect to signal enhancement, imaging quality, and diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: In a total of 83 patients (91%) the signal enhancement led to a moderate to high imaging quality allowing to reach 67 definite neurovascular diagnoses (74%). In subgroup analysis, the amount of sufficiently confident examinations was significantly higher for the transtemporal and transforaminal (both 80%) than for the extracranial approach (47%). The latter was mostly due to artificial signals derived from adjacent neck vessels. CONCLUSION: Levovist constitutes a safe and highly effective diagnostic tool especially for the transtemporal and transforaminal neurosonographical imaging. By means of a differentiated application of echocontrast agents, its cost-effectiveness can be increased and the need for other potential invasive and expansive neuroimaging methods can be further reduced.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the potential and limitations of echocontrast enhancement using Levovist in a non selected consecutive cohort of neurologicalpatients with insufficient native ultrasound investigations. METHODS: In 91 patients an indication for echocontrast application was seen after an insufficient extracranial (n = 17), transtemporal (n = 54), and transforaminal (n = 20) Doppler- und color-coded Duplex sonography. Levovist was injected at a concentration of 400 mg/ml and 200-400 mg/ml for the transcranial and extracranial approach, respectively. The effect of the echocontrast enhancement was assessed semiquantitatively with respect to signal enhancement, imaging quality, and diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: In a total of 83 patients (91%) the signal enhancement led to a moderate to high imaging quality allowing to reach 67 definite neurovascular diagnoses (74%). In subgroup analysis, the amount of sufficiently confident examinations was significantly higher for the transtemporal and transforaminal (both 80%) than for the extracranial approach (47%). The latter was mostly due to artificial signals derived from adjacent neck vessels. CONCLUSION: Levovist constitutes a safe and highly effective diagnostic tool especially for the transtemporal and transforaminal neurosonographical imaging. By means of a differentiated application of echocontrast agents, its cost-effectiveness can be increased and the need for other potential invasive and expansive neuroimaging methods can be further reduced.
Authors: D-A Clevert; E M Jung; R Kubale; T Waggershauser; M Stickel; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; R Kopp; M Reiser Journal: Radiologe Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 0.635