Literature DB >> 9824397

Bee sting allergy in beekeepers.

C Eich-Wanger1, U R Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beekeepers are strongly exposed to honey bee stings and therefore at an increased risk to develop IgE-mediated allergy to bee venom.
OBJECTIVE: We wondered whether bee venom-allergic beekeepers were different from normally exposed bee venom-allergic patients with regard to clinical and immunological parameters as well as their response to venom immunotherapy.
METHOD: Among the 459 bee venom-allergic patients seen over the 5 year period 1987-91, 62 (14%) were beekeepers and 44 (10%) family members of beekeepers. These two groups were compared with 101 normally exposed bee venom-allergic patients matched with the allergic beekeepers for age and sex, regarding clinical parameters, skin sensitivity, specific IgE and IgG antibodies to bee venom as well as safety and efficacy of venom immunotherapy.
RESULTS: As expected, allergic beekeepers had been stung most frequently before the first allergic reaction. The three groups showed a similar severity of allergic symptoms following bee stings and had an equal incidence of atopic diseases. Allergic beekeepers showed higher levels of bee venom-specific serum IgG, lower skin sensitivity and lower levels of bee venom specific serum IgE than bee venom-allergic control patients. A negative correlation between number of stings and skin sensitivity as well as specific IgE was found in allergic beekeepers and their family members, while the number of stings was positively correlated with specific IgG in these two groups. Venom immunotherapy was equally effective in the three groups, but better tolerated by allergic beekeepers than the two other groups. The majority of allergic beekeepers continued bee-keeping successfully under the protection of venom immunotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The lower level of sensitivity in diagnostic tests and the better tolerance of immunotherapy in allergic beekeepers is most likely related to the high level of specific IgG in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9824397     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00411.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  5 in total

Review 1.  The nociceptive and anti-nociceptive effects of bee venom injection and therapy: a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Jun Chen; William R Lariviere
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 2.  Abundance and Stability as Common Properties of Allergens.

Authors:  Alexander C Y Foo; Geoffrey A Mueller
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2021-10-28

3.  Analysis of serum IgE reactivity profiles with microarrayed allergens indicates absence of de novo IgE sensitizations in adults.

Authors:  Christian Lupinek; Katharina Marth; Verena Niederberger; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Apitherapy: usage and experience in german beekeepers.

Authors:  Markus Hellner; Daniel Winter; Richard von Georgi; Karsten Münstedt
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Changes in IgE- and antigen-dependent histamine-release in peripheral blood of Schistosoma mansoni-infected Ugandan fishermen after treatment with praziquantel.

Authors:  Mohamed Z Satti; Pierre Cahen; Per S Skov; Sarah Joseph; Frances M Jones; Colin Fitzsimmons; Karl F Hoffmann; Claus Reimert; H Curtis Kariuki; Francis Kazibwe; Joseph K Mwatha; Gachuhi Kimani; Birgitte J Vennervald; John H Ouma; Narcis B Kabatereine; David W Dunne
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 3.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.