Literature DB >> 9823995

A controlled comparison of directly observed therapy vs self-administered therapy for active tuberculosis in the urban United States.

B L Davidson1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment completion rates at 8 and 12 months after treatment initiation for patients with active TB treated with either directly observed therapy (DOT) or self-administered therapy (SAT).
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study of DOT and SAT concurrent patient cohorts.
SETTING: Urban Tuberculosis Control Program within a Department of Public Health. PATIENTS: Three hundred nineteen patients confirmed to have active TB between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1995, who began outpatient drug therapy.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients and/or their physicians chose to receive their anti-TB drug therapy by DOT (n=113) or SAT (n=206) and were assessed for treatment completion at prospectively determined times, 8 and 12 months. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Proportions of patients who completed treatment at 8 and 12 months without crossing over to the other group were compared. At 8 months, 52% of DOT and 35% of SAT patients had completed treatment (relative superiority of DOT, 49%; p=0.003). At 12 months, completion rates were 70% for DOT patients and 53% for SAT patients (relative superiority of DOT, 30%; p=0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, patients receiving DOT were much more likely to complete treatment earlier than those receiving SAT. Even with DOT, only 52% of patients had completed treatment by 8 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823995     DOI: 10.1378/chest.114.5.1239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  4 in total

Review 1.  Directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis: why, when, how and if?

Authors:  L P Ormerod
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  The reliability and practicality of the Arkansas method assay of isoniazid adherence.

Authors:  Katharine E Schmitz; Melbourne F Hovell; Charlene A Wong; Norma J Kelley; Donata Nilsen; Elaine J Blumberg; Linda L Hill; Carol L Sipan; Bo Kolody; Dale A Chatfield
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.075

Review 3.  Drug therapy in spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; Gaurav Khandelwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adherence interventions and outcomes of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Narges Alipanah; Leah Jarlsberg; Cecily Miller; Nguyen Nhat Linh; Dennis Falzon; Ernesto Jaramillo; Payam Nahid
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.