Literature DB >> 9823909

Preoperative duplex imaging is required before all operations for primary varicose veins.

K G Mercer1, D J Scott, D C Berridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical examination is unreliable in the detection of sources of reflux in varicose veins. Hand-held Doppler (HHD) ultrasonography has been recommended as an accurate adjunct to physical examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of HHD imaging in comparison with duplex ultrasonography.
METHODS: Eighty-nine legs in 61 patients with primary varicose veins were examined with an HHD probe to detect reflux at the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), the saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) and in thigh perforators (TPs). Patients then underwent duplex imaging and the results of the tests were compared.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the HHD technique was 73 per cent at the SFJ, 77 per cent at the SPJ and 51 per cent for TPs. In primary varicose veins the surgery planned using HHD imaging alone would have left residual sites of reflux in 24 per cent.
CONCLUSION: Examination with HHD ultrasonography is not sufficiently accurate to plan varicose vein surgery. Duplex imaging is recommended before all operations for primary varicose veins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823909     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00877.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  A survey of the current management of varicose veins by members of the Vascular Surgical Society.

Authors:  T A Lees; J D Beard; B M Ridler; T Szymanska
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Clinical examination of varicose veins--a validation study.

Authors:  J Kim; S Richards; P J Kent
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Clinical and hand-held Doppler examination of primary varicose veins.

Authors:  B Campbell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Varicose veins and their management.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-05

5.  How should a candidate assess varicose veins in the MRCS clinical examination? A vascular viewpoint.

Authors:  N Bhasin; D J A Scott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Long-term results of vein sparing varicose vein surgery.

Authors:  Peter Raivio; Vesa Perhoniemi; Aarno Lehtola
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  [Guidelines for sclerotherapy of varicose veins : S2k guideline of the German Society of Phlebology (DGP) in cooperation with the following professional associations: DDG, DGA, DDG, BVP. German Version].

Authors:  E Rabe; F X Breu; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; S Guggenbichler; B Kahle; R Murena; S Reich-Schupke; T Schwarz; M Stücker; E Valesky; S Werth; F Pannier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.751

8.  Current treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  François Becker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-04

9.  Clinical Tests Combined with Color Doppler Versus Color Doppler Alone in Identifying Incompetent Perforator Veins of the Lower Limb: A Prospective Analytical Study.

Authors:  Sathasivam Sureshkumar; Narayan Vignesh; J Venkatachalam; Chellappa Vijayakumar; Sundaramurthi Sudharsanan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-05

Review 10.  Sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins : S2k guideline of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (DGP) in cooperation with the following societies: DDG, DGA, DGG, BVP.

Authors:  E Rabe; F X Breu; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; S Guggenbichler; B Kahle; R Murena; S Reich-Schupke; T Schwarz; M Stücker; E Valesky; S Werth; F Pannier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.751

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.