Literature DB >> 9823894

Navigation through vector addition.

A S Etienne1, R Maurer, J Berlie, B Reverdin, T Rowe, J Georgakopoulos, V Séguinot.   

Abstract

During short foraging excursions away from their home, central place foragers update their position relative to their point of departure by processing signals generated by locomotion. They therefore can home along a self-generated vector without using learned references. In rodents and other mammals, this path integration process (dead reckoning) can occur on the basis of purely internal signals, such as vestibular or proprioceptive (re)afferences. We report here that hamsters are also capable of proceeding to a previously learned feeding site through vector information from locomotion only. The subjects compute the direction and distance to the goal by subtracting their current-position vector from the stored nest-to-goal vector. This computation pertains to locations per se and therefore occurs in absolute space, independently of landmark objects. If available, prominent visual cues merely serve to confirm the path planned through the addition of self-generated vectors, whereas visual as well as nonvisual references confirm that the subject has arrived at the goal site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823894     DOI: 10.1038/24151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  A subterranean mammal uses the magnetic compass for path integration.

Authors:  Tali Kimchi; Ariane S Etienne; Joseph Terkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A computational model of parallel navigation systems in rodents.

Authors:  Ricardo Chavarriaga; Thomas Strösslin; Denis Sheynikhovich; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

3.  The Firing Rate Speed Code of Entorhinal Speed Cells Differs across Behaviorally Relevant Time Scales and Does Not Depend on Medial Septum Inputs.

Authors:  Holger Dannenberg; Craig Kelley; Alec Hoyland; Caitlin K Monaghan; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Substratal idiothetic navigation of rats is impaired by removal or devaluation of extramaze and intramaze cues.

Authors:  A Stuchlik; A A Fenton; J Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple sources of celestial compass information in the Central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Patrick Schultheiss; Alice Baniel; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Active sensing associated with spatial learning reveals memory-based attention in an electric fish.

Authors:  James J Jun; André Longtin; Leonard Maler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Otolith dysfunction alters exploratory movement in mice.

Authors:  Philip A Blankenship; Lucia A Cherep; Tia N Donaldson; Sarah N Brockman; Alexandria D Trainer; Ryan M Yoder; Douglas G Wallace
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dynamics of hippocampal spatial representation in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Grid cells and theta as oscillatory interference: theory and predictions.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 10.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery.

Authors:  Patrick Byrne; Suzanna Becker; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.