Literature DB >> 9823059

Sensitivity and specificity of antigen-capture ELISAs for diagnosis of Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma vivax infections in cattle.

M C Eisler1, P Lessard, R A Masake, S K Moloo, A S Peregrine.   

Abstract

Sensitivity and specificity of the FAO/IAEA antigen-ELISA kits for diagnosis of bovine trypanosomosis were investigated using sera from experimental cattle infected by tsetse challenge with cloned populations of Trypanosoma congolense (three populations) or T. vivax (one population). The kits are based on monoclonal antibodies that recognise internal antigens of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomes. Ten cattle were infected with each trypanosome population for at least 60 days, and in combination with uninfected cohorts (n = 16) were used in a double-blind study design. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests depended on the choice of positive-negative thresholds expressed as percent positivity with respect to the median OD of four replicates of the strong positive reference serum provided with the kit. In general, while overall specificities were high, sensitivities of the antigen-ELISAs were poor. For example, at a cut-off of 5% positivity, the sensitivities of the antigen-ELISAs were 11% for samples (n = 1162) from T. congolense infected cattle (n = 30), and 24% for samples (n = 283) from T. vivax infected cattle (n = 10). The corresponding specificity values were 95% and 79%, respectively. At a cut-off of 2.5% positivity sensitivity for T. congolense was 25%, and for T. vivax 35%; corresponding specificity values were 85% and 63% respectively. There were no values of the positive-negative threshold at which both sensitivity and specificity were satisfactory. Restricting the analyses to samples taken more than 2 weeks after tsetse challenge did little to improve sensitivity estimates. Trypanosome species specificities of the antigen-ELISAs were also poor. Sensitivity and species specificity of the antigen-ELISA for Trypanosoma brucei infections were not investigated. In contrast to the antigen-ELISA, the sensitivity of the buffy-coat technique when applied to the same experimental animals was fairly high at 67% for T. congolense infections and 60% for T. vivax infections. For samples taken more than 2 weeks after tsetse challenge, high sensitivity estimates of 96% for T. congolense and 76% for T. vivax infections were obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823059     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00173-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  9 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of the antibody-detection ELISA technique using microplates precoated with denatured crude antigens from Trypanosoma congolense or Trypanosoma vivax.

Authors:  J W Magona; J S P Mayende; J Walubengo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Trypanosoma vivax GM6 antigen: a candidate antigen for diagnosis of African animal trypanosomosis in cattle.

Authors:  Davita Pillay; Julien Izotte; Regassa Fikru; Philipe Büscher; Hermogenes Mucache; Luis Neves; Alain Boulangé; Momar Talla Seck; Jérémy Bouyer; Grant B Napier; Cyrille Chevtzoff; Virginie Coustou; Théo Baltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Structural basis for the high specificity of a Trypanosoma congolense immunoassay targeting glycosomal aldolase.

Authors:  Joar Pinto; Steven Odongo; Felicity Lee; Vaiva Gaspariunaite; Serge Muyldermans; Stefan Magez; Yann G-J Sterckx
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 4.  A review on the diagnosis of animal trypanosomoses.

Authors:  Marc Desquesnes; Marisa Gonzatti; Alireza Sazmand; Sophie Thévenon; Géraldine Bossard; Alain Boulangé; Geoffrey Gimonneau; Philippe Truc; Stéphane Herder; Sophie Ravel; Denis Sereno; Vincent Jamonneau; Sathaporn Jittapalapong; Philippe Jacquiet; Philippe Solano; David Berthier
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Diagnosis of animal trypanosomoses: proper use of current tools and future prospects.

Authors:  Marc Desquesnes; Alireza Sazmand; Marisa Gonzatti; Alain Boulangé; Géraldine Bossard; Sophie Thévenon; Geoffrey Gimonneau; Philippe Truc; Stéphane Herder; Sophie Ravel; Denis Sereno; Etienne Waleckx; Vincent Jamonneau; Philippe Jacquiet; Sathaporn Jittapalapong; David Berthier; Philippe Solano; Laurent Hébert
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Comparative evaluation of three PCR base diagnostic assays for the detection of pathogenic trypanosomes in cattle blood.

Authors:  Samuel M Thumbi; Francis A McOdimba; Reuben O Mosi; Joseph O Jung'a
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of bovine trypanosomiasis and epidemiological surveillance in Bolivia.

Authors:  Jose Luis Gonzales; Tudor W Jones; Kim Picozzi; Hugo Ribera Cuellar
Journal:  Kinetoplastid Biol Dis       Date:  2003-10-28

8.  An Anti-proteome Nanobody Library Approach Yields a Specific Immunoassay for Trypanosoma congolense Diagnosis Targeting Glycosomal Aldolase.

Authors:  Steven Odongo; Yann G J Sterckx; Benoît Stijlemans; Davita Pillay; Théo Baltz; Serge Muyldermans; Stefan Magez
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-02-02

9.  Development of a Nanobody-based lateral flow assay to detect active Trypanosoma congolense infections.

Authors:  Joar E Pinto Torres; Julie Goossens; Jianzu Ding; Zeng Li; Shaohong Lu; Didier Vertommen; Peter Naniima; Rui Chen; Serge Muyldermans; Yann G-J Sterckx; Stefan Magez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.