Literature DB >> 9823047

Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance.

T Bossert1.   

Abstract

Decentralization has long been advocated as a desirable process for improving health systems. Nevertheless, we still lack a sufficient analytical framework for systematically studying how decentralization can achieve this objective. We do not have adequate means of analyzing the three key elements of decentralization: (1) the amount of choice that is transferred from central institutions to institutions at the periphery of health systems, (2) what choices local officials make with their increased discretion and (3) what effect these choices have on the performance of the health system. This article proposes a framework of analysis that can be used to design and evaluate the decentralization of health systems. It starts from the assumption that decentralization is not an end in itself but rather should be designed and evaluated for its ability to achieve broader objectives of health reform: equity, efficiency, quality and financial soundness. Using a "principal agent" approach as the basic framework, but incorporating insights from public administration, local public choice and social capital approaches, the article presents a decision space approach which defines decentralization in terms of the set of functions and degrees of choice that formally are transferred to local officials. The approach also evaluates the incentives that central government can offer to local decision-makers to encourage them to achieve health objectives. It evaluates the local government characteristics that also influence decision-making and implementation at the local level. Then it determines whether local officials innovate by making choices that are different from those directed by central authorities. Finally, it evaluates whether the local choices have improved the performance of the local health system in achieving the broader health objectives. Examples from Colombia are used to illustrate the approach. The framework will be used to analyze the experience of decentralization in a series of empirical studies in Latin America. The results of these studies should suggest policy recommendations for adjusting decision space and incentives so that localities make decisions that achieve the objectives of health reform.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823047     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00234-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  85 in total

1.  Analyzing the influence of institutions on health policy development in Uganda: a case study of the decision to abolish user fees.

Authors:  K A Moat; J Abelson
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Helping public sector health systems innovate: the strategic approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs.

Authors:  Peter Fajans; Ruth Simmons; Laura Ghiron
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The experience of implementing the board of trustees' policy in teaching hospitals in Iran: an example of health system decentralization.

Authors:  Leila Doshmangir; Arash Rashidian; Hamid Ravaghi; Amirhossein Takian; Mehdi Jafari
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-31

4.  U-Form vs. M-Form: How to Understand Decision Autonomy Under Healthcare Decentralization? Comment on "Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis".

Authors:  Arturo Vargas Bustamante
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Decentralisation, Decision Space and Directions for Future Research Comment on "Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis".

Authors:  Maryam Zahmatkesh; Mark Exworthy
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-10-01

6.  Decision Space and Capacities in the Decentralization of Health Services in FijiComment on "Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis".

Authors:  Thomas J Bossert
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 7.  Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.

Authors:  Adenantera Dwicaksono; Ashley M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Creating spatially defined databases for equitable health service planning in low-income countries: the example of Kenya.

Authors:  A M Noor; P W Gikandi; S I Hay; R O Muga; R W Snow
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.112

9.  Health system performance at the district level in Indonesia after decentralization.

Authors:  Peter Heywood; Yoonjoung Choi
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2010-03-05

10.  The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania.

Authors:  Michael A Munga; Nils Gunnar Songstad; Astrid Blystad; Ottar Maestad
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2009-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.