Literature DB >> 9822944

Implications of the traditional and the new ACSM physical activity recommendations on weight reduction in dietary treated obese subjects.

C Weyer1, R Linkeschowa, T Heise, H T Giesen, M Spraul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptance of the traditional American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) exercise recommendation (20-60 min of vigorous exercise at least three times per week) and of the new, broader Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/ACSM physical activity recommendation (30 min of moderate intensity activities on most days of the week) in an obese population and to elucidate the implications of meeting these recommendations on weight reduction during dietary treatment.
DESIGN: Prospective dietary intervention study of 1000 kcal diet daily.
SUBJECTS: 109 obese subjects (age: 45.6 +/- 13.1 y, body mass index (BMI): 38.1 +/- 6.0 kg/m2, (Female/Male: 81/19%) MEASUREMENTS: The time spent in moderate (3-6 MET, metabolic equivalents) and vigorous (6-10 MET) physical activities was assessed by use of the Stanford-7-Day-Physical-Activity-Recall-Questionnaire, with subsequent allocation of the subjects to one of three physical activity groups: meeting the traditional recommendation (TR), the new recommendation (NR) or neither of both (SED, sedentary subjects). Physical activity level, physical activity energy expenditure, total energy expenditure (based upon the questionnaire) and resting metabolic rate (by standard equation) were estimated at baseline. Body weight was determined at baseline and after a mean of 16.3 weeks of dietary treatment.
RESULTS: The new, broader recommendation was met by twice as many of the obese subjects (34%) as was the traditional recommendation (17%). Weight reduction at follow up (-8.2 +/- 6.5 kg, 16.3 +/- 4.3 weeks, mean +/- s.d.) was positively correlated with the physical activity level at baseline (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). Meeting either the traditional or the new recommendation was associated with greater weight loss [-11.9 +/- 8.5 kg (TR) and -10.1 +/- 6.4 kg (NR), respectively, not statistically significant (NS)] as compared to being sedentary [-6.5 +/- 5.2 kg (SED), P < 0.05 vs both NR and TR].
CONCLUSIONS: Not only participation in vigorous exercise, but also regular engagement in moderate intensity physical activities, as recently recommended by the CDC/ACSM, predicts greater weight reduction during dietary treatment, compared to being sedentary. The new, broader physical activity recommendation appears to be more readily accepted by obese subjects than the former ACSM recommendation on exercise training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9822944     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  7 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.

Authors:  C E Tudor-Locke; A M Myers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Diabetes and exercise.

Authors:  N S Peirce
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  N Thomas; E Alder; G P Leese
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Bone-mineral density deficits from childhood cancer and its therapy. A review of at-risk patient cohorts and available imaging methods.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-02-12

5.  Yoga training improves metabolic parameters in obese boys.

Authors:  Dae Yun Seo; Sungryul Lee; Arturo Figueroa; Hyoung Kyu Kim; Yeong Ho Baek; Yi Sub Kwak; Nari Kim; Tae Hoon Choi; Byoung Doo Rhee; Kyung Soo Ko; Byung Joo Park; Song Young Park; Jin Han
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.016

6.  Estimated physical activity in Bavaria, Germany, and its implications for obesity risk: results from the BVS-II Study.

Authors:  Nina Schaller; Henrike Seiler; Stephanie Himmerich; Georg Karg; Kurt Gedrich; Günther Wolfram; Jakob Linseisen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  You Are What You Tweet: Connecting the Geographic Variation in America's Obesity Rate to Twitter Content.

Authors:  Ross Joseph Gore; Saikou Diallo; Jose Padilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.