R Moe-Nilssen1. 1. Division of Physiotherapy Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate repeatability of acceleration measured by a portable, triaxial accelerometer over the lumbar spine as a measure of balance during standing and walking. DESIGN: Acceleration was measured along three axes and transformed to a horizontal-vertical coordinate system. Standing was tested on two feet, vision unobstructed and obstructed, and on one foot, vision unobstructed. Walking was tested in five different self-selected speeds on even and uneven ground. Retest was performed after 2 days. SETTING: A flat floor with a 7m uneven mat. SUBJECTS: Nineteen healthy students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standing: Acceleration root mean square (RMS). Walking: Point estimate of acceleration RMS for a reference walking speed (1.2m/sec). All tests: Within-subject standard deviation (sw), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The sw indicated high absolute test-retest repeatability for standing on two feet. Because of restricted ranges of value, relative reliability was low, however, with ICC(3,1) < .56. For standing on one foot, absolute and relative reliability were highest in the mediolateral direction, with ICC(3,1) = .84. For the walking tests, ICC(3,1) ranged from .79 to .94 for the three axes. Reliability was on the same level for even and uneven ground. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that accelerometry without need for stationary instrumentation is a reliable method that may be useful for studying standing balance and gait in the clinic.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate repeatability of acceleration measured by a portable, triaxial accelerometer over the lumbar spine as a measure of balance during standing and walking. DESIGN: Acceleration was measured along three axes and transformed to a horizontal-vertical coordinate system. Standing was tested on two feet, vision unobstructed and obstructed, and on one foot, vision unobstructed. Walking was tested in five different self-selected speeds on even and uneven ground. Retest was performed after 2 days. SETTING: A flat floor with a 7m uneven mat. SUBJECTS: Nineteen healthy students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standing: Acceleration root mean square (RMS). Walking: Point estimate of acceleration RMS for a reference walking speed (1.2m/sec). All tests: Within-subject standard deviation (sw), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The sw indicated high absolute test-retest repeatability for standing on two feet. Because of restricted ranges of value, relative reliability was low, however, with ICC(3,1) < .56. For standing on one foot, absolute and relative reliability were highest in the mediolateral direction, with ICC(3,1) = .84. For the walking tests, ICC(3,1) ranged from .79 to .94 for the three axes. Reliability was on the same level for even and uneven ground. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that accelerometry without need for stationary instrumentation is a reliable method that may be useful for studying standing balance and gait in the clinic.
Authors: Silvia Del Din; Alan Godfrey; Shirley Coleman; Brook Galna; Sue Lord; Lynn Rochester Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Kristin A Lowry; Jessie M Vanswearingen; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Jennifer S Brach Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Reynolette Ettienne; Claudio R Nigg; Fenfang Li; Yuhua Su; Katalina McGlone; Bret Luick; Alvin Tachibana; Christina Carran; Jobel Mercado; Rachel Novotny Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2016-04